From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14282C66 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:46:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lfbn-1-18623-73.w90-103.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.103.154.73] helo=droids-corp.org) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <olivier.matz@6wind.com>) id 1dosjZ-0008HN-Pi; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 16:52:19 +0200 Received: by droids-corp.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 04 Sep 2017 16:46:37 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:46:37 +0200 From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com> To: santosh <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com Message-ID: <20170904144636.7kot5gcvpv3w5k4a@neon> References: <20170720134759.4680-1-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> <20170815060743.21076-1-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> <20170815060743.21076-3-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> <20170904142232.jri222kqnvc5sorv@neon> <a4e797bc-a3e3-20f8-caca-eb2a07ec3a32@caviumnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <a4e797bc-a3e3-20f8-caca-eb2a07ec3a32@caviumnetworks.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] mempool: add mempool arg in xmem size and usage X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 14:46:44 -0000 On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:03:53PM +0530, santosh wrote: > > > On Monday 04 September 2017 07:52 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:37:38AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > >> xmem_size and xmem_usage need to know the status of mp->flag. > >> Following patch will make use of that. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_mempool_gntalloc.c | 5 +++-- > >> lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 10 ++++++---- > >> lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 8 ++++++-- > >> test/test/test_mempool.c | 4 ++-- > >> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_mempool_gntalloc.c b/drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_mempool_gntalloc.c > >> index 73e82f808..ee0bda459 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_mempool_gntalloc.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xenvirt/rte_mempool_gntalloc.c > >> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ _create_mempool(const char *name, unsigned elt_num, unsigned elt_size, > >> pg_shift = rte_bsf32(pg_sz); > >> > >> rte_mempool_calc_obj_size(elt_size, flags, &objsz); > >> - sz = rte_mempool_xmem_size(elt_num, objsz.total_size, pg_shift); > >> + sz = rte_mempool_xmem_size(elt_num, objsz.total_size, pg_shift, NULL); > >> pg_num = sz >> pg_shift; > >> > >> pa_arr = calloc(pg_num, sizeof(pa_arr[0])); > > What is the meaning of passing NULL to rte_mempool_xmem_size()? > > Does it mean that flags are ignored? > > Yes that mean flags are ignored. But the flags change the return value of rte_mempool_xmem_size(), right? So, correct me if I'm wrong, but if we don't pass the proper flags, the returned value won't be the one we expect. > > > Wouldn't it be better to pass the mempool flags instead of the mempool > > pointer? > > Keeping mempool as param rather flag useful in case user want to do/refer more > thing in future for xmem_size/usage() api. Otherwise he has append one more param > to api and send out deprecation notice.. Btw, its const param so won;t hurt right? > > However if you still want to restrict param to mp->flags then pl. suggest. > > Thanks. > >