From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f179.google.com (mail-wr0-f179.google.com [209.85.128.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB22D6D45 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r74so1137440wrb.13 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mMt9LxEJDKkFRt/pGOqwvUETivI0p+qzgVOyUVeDjkM=; b=wBCAoHONwWF9nFddOeDD48vAzFJlhiuGcsI4QwJ8u7l467UfQZJnWZWCprrt8bMrzC S/upn7OCRLvR0YKx3q8erYSNsT2BND3zRnX/um8skNyTlvJU9zhOOhGVBfgFSYpLpokW 76z6vbubSZXMkJo2duYkMpXlBFVL0kWsMg4+ItN+/k/S6+Xu514a+fFxY8NcVoRGetgN b0HPZUXFDpSv8UtBqqgiG48mx95P3md0EWM/m0zrokx5YOODLIWI+HJc12VJNrwnf7Ha 6s463DOmQ2g8dGhLoKj5Tl/Pc3CRT5k7KaspyWeGZbZ+lAPC6iqJqTnzUZ/ap+NMgqLH PyOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mMt9LxEJDKkFRt/pGOqwvUETivI0p+qzgVOyUVeDjkM=; b=lKkNtYg47VXdN3NnlYjDYVUlvuYQuEuepjIaco1klSOWMnHTfieQqj0ICaE5ltUX8m Mfp9mlVNLfgUdsqdDAtl0zr7JAannRe/9NRuIPhVCNXhLe9h4nPgTfaEm9YlHArSincJ wTd7TIsB3T63Gc3sDgjojqJa6dkJkpN6xaf332zxULqdpzmIR47oYBxyPp27C+fNgrwd DKSlBTebBck1EYM8m4rDsxX2RrHAGMiU5DpTOvWKr11k1FZ88iE6V+rHr1OOP9XK+hyp DDgGALFVnUE3qX1nbv8aq/wuJGvdGCxsDsp4GLvNLUihKEd5HX7FtBA5pA6Fwx1/NIlF wpCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi1mAAnDMJKE6emewEYM+gbIgfQ9OowB3vPqvqcTsQPnAqAT0bV MveYEfUNQn8G7cYZqTWgsKaxDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD4igfj+to/8wjTH+njnd/gN1+ER2jYY3iKcnaTlDgCWuNhYivd1PXrBGtCdumZlcbSGUETyQ== X-Received: by 10.223.136.119 with SMTP id e52mr4601137wre.225.1506092258435; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g13sm31574wrg.63.2017.09.22.07.57.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:57:23 +0200 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170922145722.GA3871@6wind.com> References: <20170922113007.43385-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170922113007.43385-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: revert use device name from device structure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:57:38 -0000 On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:30:07PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > This reverts commit a1e7c17555e8f77d520ba5f06ed26c00e77a2bd1. > > Original commit assumes there is 1:1 mapping between physical device and > ethdev port, so that device name can be used per port instead of ethdev > name field. > > But one physical device may have multiple ethdev ports and each port > needs its own unique name. > > One issue reported here: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-September/002484.html > > So reverting back the commit to continue using ethdev name field per > port. > > Reported-by: Adrien Mazarguil > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND