From: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:01:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009080137.GM1545@yliu-home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3748687.9eGIfCGZ7i@xps>
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we
> > > > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in
> > > > > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, if order for this to happen the community will have to
> > > > > provide a maintainer, either for 17.11 LTS or for 16.11 LTS (to allow
> > > > > Yuanhan to move from 16.11 LTS maintenance to 17.11 LTS maintenance).
> > > > >
> > > > > Ideally this person should come from one of the OSVs. Either way if
> > > > > we don't get a volunteer we won't have a 17.11 LTS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Volunteers please step forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > >
> > > > Hello John,
> > > >
> > > > I was just about to write you :-)
> > > >
> > > > I am available to volunteer. I've just got permission from AT&T
> > > > management to dedicate some working hours every week to the project
> > > > (this is the reason why I didn't say anything on the spot - I needed to
> > > > ask first due to the time requirements).
> > > >
> > > > I am fine with either 16.11 or 17.11, whichever Yuanhan prefers.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot Luca, and welcome :)
> >
> > +1 :)
> >
> > > You will have to send me a public SSH key.
> >
> > And we may should have a short chat, about the scripts I used for managing
> > the stable/LTS releases.
> >
> > > Yuanhan, how do you prefer to split the workload?
> >
> > I'd prefer 17.11.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> You mean that you are interested in managing 17.11 LTS yourself?
> So Luca would become the new maintainer of 16.11 LTS?
Yes. Luca, okay to you?
> Handshake?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 16:05 Mcnamara, John
2017-10-06 16:25 ` Luca Boccassi
2017-10-06 17:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-09 1:44 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-10-09 7:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-09 8:01 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2017-10-09 9:43 ` Luca Boccassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171009080137.GM1545@yliu-home \
--to=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).