DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Cc: Moti Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx4: fix missing initializers for old GCC
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:21:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024152114.d2zfclazcu4cb27e@laranjeiro-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024143505.GB26782@6wind.com>

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 04:35:05PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Hi Nelio,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Nélio Laranjeiro wrote:
> > Hi Moti,
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 03:35:33PM +0300, Moti Haimovsky wrote:
> > > This patch works around compilation issues seen on RHEL 7.2
> > > using GCC 4.8.5:
> > > 
> > >    [...] In function 'mlx4_rss_init':
> > >    [...]/mlx4_rxq.c:433:19: error: 'wq_num' may be used uninitialized
> > >         in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > 
> > > Fixes: ff3397e90080 ("net/mlx4: relax Rx queue configuration order")
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Moti Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxq.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxq.c b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxq.c
> > > index fb28290..4c50077 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxq.c
> > > @@ -417,6 +417,8 @@ void mlx4_rss_detach(struct mlx4_rss *rss)
> > >  		if (wq) {
> > >  			wq_num = wq->wq_num;
> > >  			claim_zero(ibv_destroy_wq(wq));
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			 wq_num = 0; /* Shut up GCC 4.8 warnings. */
> > >  		}
> > >  		claim_zero(ibv_destroy_cq(cq));
> > >  		if (!wq) {
> > 
> > Why not initialising the wq_num at 0 directly instead of adding this
> > else branch?
> 
> Actually that was my suggestion, it is done to highlight the code path
> where buggy GCC versions choke on what they mistake for an uninitialized
> variable. Initializing this variable earlier could possibly hide bugs
> otherwise.

I'll agree with this also.

> 
> Patch is OK for me as is:
> 
> Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> 
> -- 
> Adrien Mazarguil
> 6WIND

-- 
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-24 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-24 12:35 Moti Haimovsky
2017-10-24 14:03 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-24 14:35   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-24 15:21     ` Nélio Laranjeiro [this message]
2017-10-24 18:27     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-24 14:44 ` Adrien Mazarguil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171024152114.d2zfclazcu4cb27e@laranjeiro-vm \
    --to=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=motih@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).