From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: add nanosleep in main loop
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:12:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171110091219.GE24849@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171110060210.GA23340@amt.cnet>
Hi Marcelo,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 04:02:10AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> This patch allows a configurable pair of values to be set, which
> controls
> the frequency and length of a nanosleep call performed at test-pmd's
> iofwd main loop.
>
> The problem is the following: it is necessary to execute code
> on isolated CPUs which is not part of the packet forwarding load.
>
> For example:
>
> "echo val > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb"
>
> hangs the process, because the DPDK thread has higher
> priority than the workqueue thread which executes the flush from
> CPU local tracebuffer to CPU global trace buffer [the workitem
> in case].
>
> There are more serious issues than the trace-cmd bug, such as XFS
> workitems failing to execute causing filesystem corruption.
>
> To workaround this problem, until a proper kernel
> solution is developed, allow DPDK to nanosleep
> (hopefully with a small enough frequency and interval
> so that the performance is within acceptable levels).
I understand the need to do something about it, however the nanosleep()
approach seems questionable to me.
Testpmd's forwarding modes (particularly I/O) are used for benchmarking
purposes by many and are therefore sensitive to change. This code path is
currently free from system calls for that reason and nanosleep() is an
expensive one by definition. Even if optional or called at a low frequency,
the presence of this new code has an impact.
Since testpmd is a development tool not supposed to run in a production
environment, is there really a need for it to be patched to work around a
(temporary) Linux kernel bug?
If so, why is I/O the only forwarding mode impacted?
If it's used in a production environment and such a fix can't wait, have
other workarounds been considered:
- Replacing testpmd in I/O mode with a physical cable or switch?
- Using proper options on the kernel command line as described in [1], such
as isolcpus, rcu_nocbs, nohz_full?
[1] doc/guides/howto/pvp_reference_benchmark.rst
>
> The new parameters are:
>
> * --delay-hz: sets nanosleep frequency in Hz.
> * --delay-length: sets nanosleep length in ns.
>
> Results for delay-hz=100,delay-length=10000 (which allows
> the buffer_size_kb change to complete):
>
> Baseline run-1:
> [Histogram port 0 to port 1 at rate 2.3 Mpps] Samples: 49505, Average:
> 19008.7 ns, StdDev: 2501.0 ns, Quartiles: 17293.0/18330.0/19901.0 ns
>
> Baseline run-2:
> [Histogram port 0 to port 1 at rate 2.3 Mpps] Samples: 49606, Average:
> 19036.4 ns, StdDev: 2485.2 ns, Quartiles: 17318.0/18349.0/19936.0 ns
>
> Baseline run-3:
> [Histogram port 0 to port 1 at rate 2.3 Mpps] Samples: 49627, Average:
> 19019.2 ns, StdDev: 2503.7 ns, Quartiles: 17323.0/18355.0/19940.0 ns
>
> ============================
>
> (10.000us, 100HZ)
>
> Run-1:
> [Histogram port 0 to port 1 at rate 2.3 Mpps] Samples: 7284, Average:
> 20830.6 ns, StdDev: 12023.0 ns, Quartiles: 17309.0/18394.0/20233.0 ns
>
> Run-2:
> [Histogram port 0 to port 1 at rate 2.3 Mpps] Samples: 6272, Average:
> 20897.1 ns, StdDev: 12057.2 ns, Quartiles: 17389.0/18457.0/20266.0 ns
>
> Run-3:
> [Histogram port 0 to port 1 at rate 2.3 Mpps] Samples: 4843, Average:
> 20535.2 ns, StdDev: 9827.3 ns, Quartiles: 17389.0/18441.0/20269.0 ns
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
>
> diff -Nur dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/iofwd.c dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/iofwd.c
> --- dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/iofwd.c 2017-10-30 22:45:37.829492673 -0200
> +++ dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/iofwd.c 2017-10-30 22:45:48.321522581 -0200
> @@ -64,9 +64,30 @@
> #include <rte_ethdev.h>
> #include <rte_string_fns.h>
> #include <rte_flow.h>
> +#include <time.h>
>
> #include "testpmd.h"
>
> +uint32_t nanosleep_interval;
> +
> +static void calc_nanosleep_interval(int hz)
> +{
> + uint64_t cycles_per_sec = rte_get_timer_hz();
> + nanosleep_interval = cycles_per_sec/hz;
> +}
> +
> +static void do_nanosleep(void)
> +{
> + struct timespec req;
> +
> + req.tv_sec = 0;
> + req.tv_nsec = nanosleep_length;
> +
> + nanosleep(&req, NULL);
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Forwarding of packets in I/O mode.
> * Forward packets "as-is".
> @@ -81,6 +102,10 @@
> uint16_t nb_tx;
> uint32_t retry;
>
> +
> + if (nanosleep_interval == 0 && nanosleep_frequency > 0)
> + calc_nanosleep_interval(nanosleep_frequency);
> +
> #ifdef RTE_TEST_PMD_RECORD_CORE_CYCLES
> uint64_t start_tsc;
> uint64_t end_tsc;
> @@ -91,6 +116,12 @@
> start_tsc = rte_rdtsc();
> #endif
>
> + if (nanosleep_frequency > 0 &&
> + rte_get_timer_cycles() > fs->next_nanosleep) {
> + do_nanosleep();
> + fs->next_nanosleep = rte_get_timer_cycles() + nanosleep_interval;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Receive a burst of packets and forward them.
> */
> diff -Nur dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/parameters.c dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> --- dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/parameters.c 2017-10-30 22:45:37.830492676 -0200
> +++ dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/parameters.c 2017-10-30 22:46:33.708651912 -0200
> @@ -216,6 +216,8 @@
> "disable print of designated event or all of them.\n");
> printf(" --flow-isolate-all: "
> "requests flow API isolated mode on all ports at initialization time.\n");
> + printf(" --delay-hz: sets nanosleep frequency in Hz.\n");
> + printf(" --delay-length: sets nanosleep length in ns.\n");
> }
>
> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_CMDLINE
> @@ -638,7 +640,9 @@
> { "no-rmv-interrupt", 0, 0, 0 },
> { "print-event", 1, 0, 0 },
> { "mask-event", 1, 0, 0 },
> - { 0, 0, 0, 0 },
> + { "delay-hz", 1, 0, 0 },
> + { "delay-length", 1, 0, 0 },
> + { 0, 0, 0, 0 },
> };
>
> argvopt = argv;
> @@ -1099,6 +1103,27 @@
> else
> rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "bad txpkts\n");
> }
> +
> + if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "delay-hz")) {
> + int n;
> +
> + n = atoi(optarg);
> +
> + if (n < 0)
> + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "bad delay-hz\n");
> + nanosleep_frequency = n;
> + }
> +
> + if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "delay-length")) {
> + int n;
> +
> + n = atoi(optarg);
> +
> + if (n < 0)
> + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "bad delay-length\n");
> + nanosleep_length = n;
> + }
> +
> if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "no-flush-rx"))
> no_flush_rx = 1;
> if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "disable-link-check"))
> diff -Nur dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> --- dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c 2017-10-30 22:45:37.829492673 -0200
> +++ dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c 2017-10-30 22:45:48.323522591 -0200
> @@ -327,6 +327,13 @@
>
> #endif
>
> +
> +/* How long to sleep in packet processing */
> +uint32_t nanosleep_length;
> +
> +/* How often to sleep in packet processing */
> +uint32_t nanosleep_frequency;
> +
> /*
> * Ethernet device configuration.
> */
> diff -Nur dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> --- dpdk-17.08.orig/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h 2017-10-30 22:45:37.829492673 -0200
> +++ dpdk-17.08/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h 2017-10-30 22:45:48.323522591 -0200
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
> struct pkt_burst_stats rx_burst_stats;
> struct pkt_burst_stats tx_burst_stats;
> #endif
> + uint64_t next_nanosleep;
> };
>
> /** Offload IP checksum in csum forward engine */
> @@ -390,6 +391,9 @@
> extern lcoreid_t latencystats_lcore_id;
> #endif
>
> +extern uint32_t nanosleep_length;
> +extern uint32_t nanosleep_frequency;
> +
> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BITRATE
> extern lcoreid_t bitrate_lcore_id;
> extern uint8_t bitrate_enabled;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-10 6:02 Marcelo Tosatti
2017-11-10 9:12 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2017-11-10 10:13 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-11-10 10:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-11-10 10:42 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-11-10 11:14 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-11-10 13:51 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-11-11 3:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-11-11 4:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-11-11 3:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-11-11 3:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-11-12 23:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-11-13 18:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-11-11 3:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171110091219.GE24849@6wind.com \
--to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).