From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Ivan Boule <ivan.boule@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org, john.mcnamara@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce API change for ethdev port info
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:13:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171115081327.gzr2rzhpftcu5hn2@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44436245.kbII4kygmp@xps>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:50:55AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/10/2017 16:27, Ivan Boule:
> > To help administrative tasks on ports, new per-port information need
> > to be added into the data structure rte_eth_dev_info supplied by the
> > dev_infos_get() function exported by a Poll Mode Driver.
> >
> > See http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/074885.html for
> > details.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Boule <ivan.boule@6wind.com>
> > Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> > ---
> > +* librte_ether: additional fields will be added into the ``rte_eth_dev_info``
> > + structure in 18.02, breaking the API. These fields will contain:
> > +
> > + - the set of supported link modes,
> > + - the set of advertised link modes,
> > + - the type of port connector,
> > + - autonegotiation enabled or not.
>
> This patch is not accepted in 17.11 for following reasons:
> - it requires at least 3 acks
> - we are not going to break API in 18.02, except maybe for EAL devargs
> - the link mode is redundant with the speed capabilities
> - such fields require work (and time) for every PMD to be fully supported
> - we should discuss more generally which infos are in the scope of this function
>
> Sorry for the short notice, I was waiting for comments and to see if
> other deprecations were sent (or not) for ethdev.
Thomas, be aware that it's very frustrating to have this kind feedback 9
weeks after the submission of the RFC, and few days before the release.
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 14:27 Ivan Boule
2017-11-14 23:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-15 8:13 ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2017-11-15 15:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-13 13:15 ` Olivier Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171115081327.gzr2rzhpftcu5hn2@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ivan.boule@6wind.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).