From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8B2B9E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2017 06:17:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,468,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="178722548" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.35]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2017 06:16:57 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:16:57 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:16:56 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.hunt@intel.com Message-ID: <20171128141656.GA10272@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20171128132203.43181-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171128132203.43181-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com> Organization: Intel Research and Development Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] power: changed unsigned to unsigned int X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:01 -0000 On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:22:00PM +0000, Marko Kovacevic wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic > --- While I know that checkpatch complains about unsigned vs unsigned int, is there some other reason for making this change wholesale in the code? /Bruce