From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com (mail-wr0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DC3239 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:52:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x49so17361149wrb.13 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 05:52:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wullqdgjDWixVG6tGpbdCap42ECTZ0lb7bVHvVy4cNM=; b=KYtUw0AJJ/3Pl5sDWUiZ3Mt4kexE4UTKaeUF11PjU1D6ZmVbfMnrhbMUFPMMVK+Yy+ IP4duR8+8jOTSxUJwX2SHiOLE6peQGJJbIedlP56T1xVPjwqqN2RJsKTm6Fki2stXRJe DIMBBoL5A01MMZvmaMbU63GGFOPxK36bq3wLMcs8CdQffp9vj80Cel41ETef5gT/kYoL eHKNkuDFtlk2sLIObEDeIRTm4uVBwi/h36wZPNLWHE/cPr1Elxh0zWUkElQUY7MM7VSL crMeGphYuQoGZ+rqDRA4cZ/SqYRY22i+d6jUifKibOaL1i+zQkJdnVWt4WY0uDQX5x1W VkBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wullqdgjDWixVG6tGpbdCap42ECTZ0lb7bVHvVy4cNM=; b=YlNJpal5lOmB4gVyVTWQB12a7SW8ixs2laKtOnsS3aMpjc1/6czEyuWMMlrdOQGzUO iaNEgOR+ZBMi+aVDEi5Smfb46+hy6jcnDxvwvJQWsmqr6lSDTSPhDX+WubBsHxayaKj+ CipwkMwZx7mlad0x0kaymHptu5UP0l8Piswu5jZ8gdg0vcCOq3k//LWIAmnuItYpoOyx qzjIwewW1HU2jaTGLD62/p3O1Z6w66I3WM56ejBm3vCt8TYTNWoFd+K1LTETdogLXgjP ItOgloPxJkSCQGkcknckfYIwQc53PkQLzQ9OQRnqTH77qgvNq0hkeEEaiTOqZQNJU6rA 23aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX49jMCVKdiKL43cxYa37C1fpijYN8g97xUVEofXsPgxgS82BNx1 8P2lHPM3am1JWAw1Qv6S1EfS/Kmv X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYd/Y1cE6pAUbgYk8WqOePBz13n43hG39R90o4duu5ogDjqrsEicdGsi6nLKq59xODQl+ySmA== X-Received: by 10.223.134.134 with SMTP id 6mr12913620wrx.72.1512395527049; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 05:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 59sm11598165wrs.41.2017.12.04.05.52.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Dec 2017 05:52:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:51:54 +0100 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Roy Franz Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Roy Franz Message-ID: <20171204135154.GD4062@6wind.com> References: <20171201182640.21885-1-roy.franz@cavium.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171201182640.21885-1-roy.franz@cavium.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] doc: Clarify wording regarding actions and flow rules. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:52:07 -0000 On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:26:39AM -0800, Roy Franz wrote: > Current wording regarding actions and flow rules doesn't make sense. > > Signed-off-by: Roy Franz > --- > Maybe a better word than 'assigned' could be chosen? (attached, > associated with, etc) I'm happy to spin this if needed. Agreed, "affected" doesn't make much sense here. I think "assigned" is the best compromise (intelligibility / changes ratio). This clarification is also a worthy candidate for stable@dpdk.org. Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND