From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC101B1B3 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:59:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v105so3432844wrc.3 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KktW34oVIAq8h+3UnGOjxq+49xy7K0Pa0e69TgxBOhg=; b=TAeIa41SoAObpe6hcxSI75AgCRBMEKk61KKE/cPdQik7i3Z3+HQ57wfpxO8xXNkGQU 0KJ/9AsIn/w+rUdWo/GZAx+GaamX3qETJbT1sCJLRspnI75oTd5V1cg4oIJHioT+Jbe3 +1ojfVPr3ugx9FzA/ogKYVCYjVEfpG/2B9alcxKaMdKMHANAZRo5YpRf77gDDQgDFJrV Q646JJP0AYJAdSVHDdVN1cSFxUzNllls6xDytW7rwOCZnIDjLdYlRW8ENwFFoXiHoeTM wPL2zVffLg83aiD9ZNDYaUEDiRK5WJo5mBn3blcPA3FTdOHWdMCiMe3Bv2WbHYS6ln82 DPiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KktW34oVIAq8h+3UnGOjxq+49xy7K0Pa0e69TgxBOhg=; b=ft9GLW5RlhWoNag5njlNM5/AblzXf75Npw4gLwTejMIF7jWN9k9KGZCMRfF0BedUgZ mD7D8eIEKHntACBYJF3ICUIF9E5IfQqCkg/Yt1nxbT9m7eJOl89rLTcqWTcO3HzLNkJz enEs46fgISO8uPyXkDT+rPuv3EYjMu+gWzrhBmR3f30Wgfn0LoLJZEg9jWEvvPLn+Cpj v4tmnNoh+zSoSGKoSLbFXhrHQnKFXT6ZAfglcLRaUXr2M8dW5SpslQajmvv8kq1qa0/o AypIA7SAra4s7pX57XhAE+ELZBCV4qFgL0XQQrg9A3EC61IWCfXvB+/acQQkodOiIgSi m0OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7pqB36CuItcrv+Ci7g9rJJuwlNGmVKJEOC3utKLnU96mX5NZTb 4gsFXmgS8c5ok69y6Ttsn5fm3wJt X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZAxKqijFyKcHP+W0x46BcXmLWfopNTYCNAgHRhSHJsbzFrqb24s5ZYyomEeN4J/OseSx6NVw== X-Received: by 10.223.178.130 with SMTP id g2mr18236779wrd.129.1512557981615; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:59:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q74sm2938952wmg.22.2017.12.06.02.59.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:59:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:59:29 +0100 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Matan Azrad Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20171206105929.GZ4062@6wind.com> References: <1511871570-16826-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> <1511871570-16826-9-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1511871570-16826-9-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] net/mlx4: remove Tx completion elements counter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 10:59:41 -0000 On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:19:30PM +0000, Matan Azrad wrote: > This counter saved the descriptor elements which are waiting to be > completted and was used to know if completion function should be completted => completed > called. > > This completion check can be done by other elements management > variables and we can prevent this counter management. > > Remove this counter and replace the completion check easily by other > elements management variables. > > Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad It's nice to finally get rid of this useless counter, Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND