From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D90237
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lfbn-1-6068-189.w90-110.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.110.3.189]
 helo=droids-corp.org)
 by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <olivier.matz@6wind.com>)
 id 1eOK1U-00021Q-8K; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:05:17 +0100
Received: by droids-corp.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:58:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:58:52 +0100
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Message-ID: <20171211085851.4fefe3obd2g7bmbx@platinum>
References: <20171208102830.2817-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <eb74dade-439e-dbf4-0455-26100755dd23@intel.com>
 <f43f61fb-3630-03ba-6328-5935276e1975@solarflare.com>
 <448cfe74-224b-8a25-6be3-42c70c6ac514@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <448cfe74-224b-8a25-6be3-42c70c6ac514@nxp.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: update licence for network headers
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:59:08 -0000

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:57:41AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
[...]
> > License text example in [1] starts from Copyright and has All rights
> > reserved.
> > I agree that template should be clearly specified from the very beginning.
> > 
> > [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause#licenseText
> > 
> Hi all,
> 	Most templates are showing copyright first and SPDX later i.e. the typical
> way for writing the license.
> 
> However some projects has followed it other way around to make it easy for
> tools i.e. the TOP line.
> 
> I agree with Ferruh that we shall follow single convention.  I will prefer
> to do it in following way to make it consistent. (I will also fix my change
> patches).
> 
> >> Copyright (C) [YEAR] NAME-OF-COPYRIGHT-HOLDER
> >> Copyright (C) [YEAR] NAME-OF-COPYRIGHT-HOLDER-2
> >> Copyright (C) [YEAR] NAME-OF-COPYRIGHT-HOLDER-3
> >> SPDX-License-Identifier:        BSD-3-Clause

OK for me, I'll send a v2.

Olivier