From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EED225E5 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:19:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-423c-e874-da8e-c543-d863.dyn6.twc.com ([2606:a000:111b:423c:e874:da8e:c543:d863] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1eOr0y-00035Y-Ay; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:19:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:18:23 -0500 From: Neil Horman To: "Mcnamara, John" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Richardson, Bruce" Message-ID: <20171212201823.GC1047@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20171211193619.21643-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:19:04 -0000 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 7:36 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Mcnamara, John ; > > Richardson, Bruce > > Subject: [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging > > > > Hey all- > > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing > > patches I would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually > > considered safe because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John > > M. asked me then what I might do to improve the situation, and the > > following patch set is a proposal that I've come up with. > > Hi Neil, > > Thanks for this and apologies in advance for making more work for you but > it would be good to have a short section in the Contributors Guide on how > to add/check experimental APIs. I think the information in this cover > letter could be repurposed along with a few code and shell examples. > > Probably as a new high level section in the Contributors Guides: > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/index.html > > Thanks, > > John > Thats ok, I was actually trying to think of where to add documentation for this thing, but couldnt find a really appropriate place. I'll add that in and repost. Neil