From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66CA1B00C;
 Fri,  5 Jan 2018 17:01:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-423c-e874-da8e-c543-d863.dyn6.twc.com
 ([2606:a000:111b:423c:e874:da8e:c543:d863] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1eXUQv-0003ai-69; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:01:30 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 11:00:52 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 john.mcnamara@intel.com, qian.q.xu@intel.com, ci@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20180105160052.GB18004@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
 <20171230171517.GA4393@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
 <20180104125631.GA919@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
 <3514290.FTHxXqWOug@xps>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3514290.FTHxXqWOug@xps>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:01:34 -0000

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:08:52PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 04/01/2018 13:56, Neil Horman:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > Thomas-
> > >      I just noticed that the ci tests are failing on the intel compiler, which
> > > makes very little sense to me, as the error is a permission error on a bash
> > > script that added in this series, which works during the gcc compilation.  Can
> > > you take a look at that please?
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > Neil
> > > 
> > Ping again Thomas, I've still heard nothing from you or the CI group about
> > getting more visibility into the odd permission problem in the CI runs this
> > seems to be encountering.  I'd love to fix it, but the information in the report
> > is insufficient to have any idea whats going on and the problem does not occur
> > on local builds.  Please advise.
> 
> Unfortunately, I have no clues about this setup.
> The report is sent by sys_stv@intel.com.
> Adding Qian as Cc.
> 
> The error is "buildtools/experimentalsyms.sh: Permission denied"
> And the file mode is 100755.
> 
> Anyone from Intel to check what happens please?
> 
Thank you Thomas.  I would really like to get this pushed in, as others have
acked it, but the lack of visibility into the CI errors is quite frustrating
Neil