From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5793250
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:53:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lfbn-lil-1-110-231.w90-45.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.45.197.231]
 helo=droids-corp.org)
 by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <olivier.matz@6wind.com>)
 id 1edbb4-0006c5-Ee; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:53:12 +0100
Received: by droids-corp.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:53:03 +0100
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:53:03 +0100
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Morten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: DPDK <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20180122125302.zmsckzxqfndgyelm@platinum>
References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35B41D74@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35B41D74@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf TX VLAN flags should be renamed
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:53:05 -0000

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:23:06PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT and PKT_RX_QINQ_PKT were renamed to PKT_RX_VLAN and
> PKT_RX_QINQ somewhere between DPDK version 16.07 and version 17.11.
>
> Shouldn’t PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT and PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT follow the same naming
> convention and get rid of the _PKT postfix?

Yes. I'll send a patch for this.

Thanks
Olivier