From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E791B71A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:19:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-4011-eaa3-4b92-4a68-8f24.dyn6.twc.com
 ([2606:a000:111b:4011:eaa3:4b92:4a68:8f24] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1egrM7-0000dp-Ji; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:19:14 -0500
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:18:39 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20180131121836.GA23692@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
 <15180448.zpY6jWigv2@xps>
 <20180130125722.GA15525@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
 <9925007.qJ5tT5KyCr@xps>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9925007.qJ5tT5KyCr@xps>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:19:17 -0000

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > > > v5 Changes
> > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
> > > 
> > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5.
> > > Rebased and applied, thanks.
> > > 
> > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this.   Are you saying that there were several
> > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed?  If
> > so, thanks for doing that.  I will also be sending another patch set soon, to
> > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the
> > version map as such
> 
> I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions
> after you sent the v5.
> So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions.
> Usual rebase work.
> 
Understood, thank you.

> About reconciling experimental functions and map,
> we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental.
> 
I figured if I were to just do a reconcilliation of everything that is currently
documented as experimental, that would be the impetus for their authors to yell
at me about their not actually being experimental anymore, and I could fix that
up in subsequent versions :)
Neil

> 
>