From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mleitner@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E571B343
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Feb 2018 13:58:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.14])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CB073B11;
 Mon,  5 Feb 2018 12:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-10.gru2.redhat.com
 [10.97.116.10])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB5C18EDB;
 Mon,  5 Feb 2018 12:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id D76EA18106E; Mon,  5 Feb 2018 10:58:06 -0200 (-02)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:58:06 -0200
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20180205125806.GE27676@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180202144736.8239-1-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
 <20180202164050.13017-1-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
 <20180202164050.13017-4-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
 <6047554.pbob4v6vxF@xps> <20180205112402.GE4256@6wind.com>
 <20180205121339.GB27676@localhost.localdomain>
 <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA65100D01D@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA65100D01D@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx: version rdma-core glue
 libraries
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:58:11 -0000

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:24:23PM +0000, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 12:14 PM
> > To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; dev@dpdk.org; Shahaf Shuler
> > <shahafs@mellanox.com>; Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx: version rdma-core glue
> > libraries
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:24:02PM +0100, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 03:29:38PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 02/02/2018 17:46, Adrien Mazarguil:
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/mlx4/Makefile
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx4/Makefile
> > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.vars.mk
> > > > >
> > > > >  # Library name.
> > > > >  LIB = librte_pmd_mlx4.a
> > > > > -LIB_GLUE = librte_pmd_mlx4_glue.so
> > > > > +LIB_GLUE = $(LIB_GLUE_BASE).$(LIB_GLUE_VERSION)
> > > > > +LIB_GLUE_BASE = librte_pmd_mlx4_glue.so
> > > > > +LIB_GLUE_VERSION = 18.02.1
> > > >
> > > > You should use the version number of the release, i.e. 18.02.0
> > > > Ideally, you should retrieve it from rte_version.h.
> > >
> > > Keep in mind this only needs to be updated when the glue API gets
> > modified,
> > > and this "18.02.1" string may remain unmodified for subsequent DPDK
> > > releases, probably as long as the PMD doesn't use any new rdma-core calls.
> > >
> > > We've already backported this patch to 17.02 and 17.11, both requiring
> > > different sets of Verbs calls and thus a different version, hence the
> > added
> > > "18.02" as a starting point. The last digit may have to be modified
> > possibly
> > > several times between official DPDK releases while work is being done on
> > the
> > > PMD (i.e. per commit).
> > >
> > > In short it's not meant to follow DPDK's public versioning scheme. If you
> > > really think it should, doing so will make things more complex in the
> > > Makefile, which will have to parse rte_version.h. What's your opinion?
> > 
> > What about appending date +%s output to it? It would be stricter and
> > automated.
> 
> Adding current timestamp or date into a build breaks reproducibility of builds, so is
> generally not recommended.

Then the sha1sum of mlx4_glue.h.
With this the size check I mentioned on the other patch would become
redundant and unnecessary.

> 
> No opinion on string/version naming here.
>