From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix rte_errno values for IPC API
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:39:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180213153906.GA160@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA651011441@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:16:08PM +0000, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:51 PM
> > To: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix rte_errno values for IPC API
> >
> > > > rte_errno values should not be negative.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: bacaa2754017 ("eal: add channel for multi-process communication")
> > > > Fixes: 783b6e54971d ("eal: add synchronous multi-process communication")
> > > > Cc: jianfeng.tan@intel.com
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks for fixing this.
> >
> > Applied, thanks
> >
> > There are a lot of similar issues:
> >
> > git grep -l 'rte_errno = -E' | sed 's,[^/]*$,,' | sort -u
> >
> > drivers/event/opdl/
> > drivers/event/sw/
> <snip>
> > lib/librte_eventdev/
>
>
> I just checked the eventdev.h port_link() docs, which indicate negative return values.
> Perhaps the header is wrong too - but the PMDs adhere to the library header in this case.
>
> Is there a requirement for rte_errno to be positive?
> It looks to be declared as per-lcore signed int in rte_errno.h +20
>
I think I wrote that part of the documentation, and it never crossed my
mind that people would set rte_errno to negative values, given how
errno from system calls are always positive. However, I think this
omission should be rectified, and we should enforce having rte_errno
values as positive.
> Either-way, if we want to change the PMDs, we should change the Eventdev APIs,
> which means API breakage, and application changes to handle changed return values.
>
> Sound like more work than it is worth it to me?
I would view it as restoring sanity (or balance to the force if you
prefer! :-) ), so I'd definitely be ok with an ABI break to do that.
/Bruce
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-13 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-10 13:15 Anatoly Burakov
2018-02-11 1:09 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-02-13 13:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-13 14:16 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-02-13 14:25 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-02-13 15:39 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180213153906.GA160@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).