DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto/mrvl: add MRVL to hash test cases
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:29:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180314102952.GA8527@sh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CCA940E@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:13:58AM +0000, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tomasz Duszynski [mailto:tdu@semihalf.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 1:27 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Doherty,
> > Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> > <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto/mrvl: add MRVL to hash test cases
> >
>
> This is targetting the crypto tests, so title should be "test/crypto: ... "

Ack.

>
>
> > This patch has been here for a while already. Should I respin it?
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:53:53PM +0100, Tomasz Duszynski wrote:
> > > MRVL Crypto PMD supports most of the hash algorithms covered by test
> > > suites thus specific bits should be set in pmd_masks.
> > >
> > > Otherwise blockcipher authonly test returns success even though no
> > > real tests have been executed.
>
> > >
> > > Fixes: 84e0ded38ac5 ("test/crypto: add mrvl crypto unit tests")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> I don't think this is a fix, so I would remove the fixes and CC stable lines.

Why? I think this should have been here since introduction on mrvl/cryto.
If you take a look at 84e0ded38ac5 there is
test called: test_authonly_mrvl_all()
which runs blockcipher tests with BLKCIPHER_AUTHONLY_TYPE flag.

Since MRVL pmd flag was missing from pmd_mask in
blockcipher_test_case_hash_test_cases table tests were not run. Moreover
overall_status variable was not touched thus test suite completed without
errors.

>
> Thanks,
> Pablo
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>
>

--
- Tomasz Duszyński

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-14 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28 14:53 Tomasz Duszynski
2018-03-08 13:27 ` Tomasz Duszynski
2018-03-13  9:32   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-03-14 10:13   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-03-14 10:29     ` Tomasz Duszynski [this message]
2018-03-14 12:03       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-03-14 13:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/crypto: " Tomasz Duszynski
2018-03-26  8:28   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-03-26  8:57   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180314102952.GA8527@sh \
    --to=tdu@semihalf.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).