From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEB24F9A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:04:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-40b7-640c-26a-4e16-9225.dyn6.twc.com ([2606:a000:111b:40b7:640c:26a:4e16:9225] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1eydPu-0006Sh-IN; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:04:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:04:01 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , Thomas Monjalon , Reshma Pattan , dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20180321130401.GA3225@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <20180309112531.292163-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20180320163404.7780-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180320163404.7780-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: return named opaque type instead of void pointer X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:05:00 -0000 On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:34:04PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > "struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback" is defined as internal data structure and > used as named opaque type. > > So the functions that are adding callbacks can return objects in this > type instead of void pointer. > > Also const qualifier added to "struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback *" to > protect it better from application modification. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > --- > v2: > * keep using struct * in parameters, instead add callback functions > return struct rte_eth_rxtx_callback pointer. > > v4: > * Remove deprecation notice. LIBABIVER already increased in this release > > v5: > * add const qualifier to rte_eth_rxtx_callback I still wish we could find a way to remove the inline functions and truly protect that struct, but a const is definately better than nothing Acked-by: Neil Horman