* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
@ 2018-03-08 19:07 Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-03-11 18:14 ` santosh
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavan Nikhilesh @ 2018-03-08 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: dev, Pavan Nikhilesh
Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
---
Checkpatch reports falsepositive for PRIx64
drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
index b739c0b39..0448e3557 100644
--- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &conf->rxmode;
struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode = &conf->txmode;
struct octeontx_nic *nic = octeontx_pmd_priv(dev);
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
int ret;
PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
@@ -283,34 +285,43 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!rxmode->hw_strip_crc) {
+ configured_offloads = rxmode->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
- rxmode->hw_strip_crc = 1;
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
}
- if (rxmode->hw_ip_checksum) {
+ if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
- rxmode->hw_ip_checksum = 0;
+ configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
}
- if (rxmode->split_hdr_size) {
- octeontx_log_err("rxmode does not support split header");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
- if (rxmode->hw_vlan_filter) {
- octeontx_log_err("VLAN filter not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
}
- if (rxmode->hw_vlan_extend) {
- octeontx_log_err("VLAN extended not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ configured_offloads = txmode->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
}
- if (rxmode->enable_lro) {
- octeontx_log_err("LRO not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
+
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
}
if (conf->link_speeds & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED) {
@@ -750,10 +761,11 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
struct octeontx_txq *txq = NULL;
uint16_t dq_num;
int res = 0;
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
RTE_SET_USED(socket_id);
- RTE_SET_USED(tx_conf);
dq_num = (nic->port_id * PKO_VF_NUM_DQ) + qidx;
@@ -771,6 +783,17 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
dev->data->tx_queues[qidx] = NULL;
}
+ configured_offloads = tx_conf->offloads;
+
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
+
/* Allocating tx queue data structure */
txq = rte_zmalloc_socket("ethdev TX queue", sizeof(struct octeontx_txq),
RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, nic->node);
@@ -826,6 +849,8 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
uint8_t gaura;
unsigned int ev_queues = (nic->ev_queues * nic->port_id) + qidx;
unsigned int ev_ports = (nic->ev_ports * nic->port_id) + qidx;
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
@@ -848,6 +873,27 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
port = nic->port_id;
+ configured_offloads = rx_conf->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
+ }
+
+ if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
+ configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
+ }
+
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
+
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
/* Rx deferred start is not supported */
if (rx_conf->rx_deferred_start) {
octeontx_log_err("rx deferred start not supported");
diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
index 10e42e142..9d6c22b0d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
#define OCTEONTX_MAX_BGX_PORTS 4
#define OCTEONTX_MAX_LMAC_PER_BGX 4
+#define OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP
+#define OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE
+
static inline struct octeontx_nic *
octeontx_pmd_priv(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{
--
2.16.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-08 19:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs Pavan Nikhilesh
@ 2018-03-11 18:14 ` santosh
2018-03-21 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: santosh @ 2018-03-11 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavan Nikhilesh, jerin.jacob, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: dev
On Friday 09 March 2018 12:37 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-08 19:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-03-11 18:14 ` santosh
@ 2018-03-21 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-22 6:26 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-03-26 7:30 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-03-26 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-05 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Pavan Nikhilesh
3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-03-21 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavan Nikhilesh, jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla; +Cc: dev, Shahaf Shuler
On 3/8/2018 7:07 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>
> Checkpatch reports falsepositive for PRIx64
>
> drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
> index b739c0b39..0448e3557 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &conf->rxmode;
> struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode = &conf->txmode;
> struct octeontx_nic *nic = octeontx_pmd_priv(dev);
> + uint64_t configured_offloads;
> + uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
> int ret;
>
> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> @@ -283,34 +285,43 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (!rxmode->hw_strip_crc) {
> + configured_offloads = rxmode->offloads;
> +
> + if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
> - rxmode->hw_strip_crc = 1;
> + configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
> }
Just as a heads up this will be changed in this release [1], CRC_STRIP will be
the default behavior without requiring a flag.
[1]
https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/093255.html
>
> - if (rxmode->hw_ip_checksum) {
> + if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
> - rxmode->hw_ip_checksum = 0;
> + configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
> }
No need to specific check for DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM, if it is not announced as
supported below unsupported_offloads will cover it.
>
> - if (rxmode->split_hdr_size) {
> - octeontx_log_err("rxmode does not support split header");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
>
> - if (rxmode->hw_vlan_filter) {
> - octeontx_log_err("VLAN filter not supported");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
> + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> }
>
> - if (rxmode->hw_vlan_extend) {
> - octeontx_log_err("VLAN extended not supported");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + configured_offloads = txmode->offloads;
> +
> + if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
> + configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
> }
>
> - if (rxmode->enable_lro) {
> - octeontx_log_err("LRO not supported");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
> +
> + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
> + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
> + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> }
>
> if (conf->link_speeds & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED) {
> @@ -750,10 +761,11 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> struct octeontx_txq *txq = NULL;
> uint16_t dq_num;
> int res = 0;
> + uint64_t configured_offloads;
> + uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
>
> RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
> RTE_SET_USED(socket_id);
> - RTE_SET_USED(tx_conf);
>
> dq_num = (nic->port_id * PKO_VF_NUM_DQ) + qidx;
>
> @@ -771,6 +783,17 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> dev->data->tx_queues[qidx] = NULL;
> }
>
> + configured_offloads = tx_conf->offloads;
> +
> + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
> + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
> + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
> + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> + }
There is a discussion about the requirement to have port offload in queue setup
or not, more details in [2], any comment is welcome.
[2]
https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092978.html
history: https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092862.html
> +
> /* Allocating tx queue data structure */
> txq = rte_zmalloc_socket("ethdev TX queue", sizeof(struct octeontx_txq),
> RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, nic->node);
> @@ -826,6 +849,8 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> uint8_t gaura;
> unsigned int ev_queues = (nic->ev_queues * nic->port_id) + qidx;
> unsigned int ev_ports = (nic->ev_ports * nic->port_id) + qidx;
> + uint64_t configured_offloads;
> + uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
>
> RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
>
> @@ -848,6 +873,27 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
>
> port = nic->port_id;
>
> + configured_offloads = rx_conf->offloads;
> +
> + if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
> + configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
> + }
Same as above.
> +
> + if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
> + configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
> + }
Not sure about changing the application configuration, and since this offload is
not reported as supported application should not set it, if it does this should
return an error.
> +
> + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
> +
> + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
> + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> + }
> /* Rx deferred start is not supported */
> if (rx_conf->rx_deferred_start) {
> octeontx_log_err("rx deferred start not supported");
> diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
> index 10e42e142..9d6c22b0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
> #define OCTEONTX_MAX_BGX_PORTS 4
> #define OCTEONTX_MAX_LMAC_PER_BGX 4
>
> +#define OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP
> +#define OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE
These should be announced in dev_info as [rt]x_offload_capa, rx one seems missing.
> +
> static inline struct octeontx_nic *
> octeontx_pmd_priv(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> --
> 2.16.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-21 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-03-22 6:26 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-03-26 7:30 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shahaf Shuler @ 2018-03-22 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Pavan Nikhilesh, jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla; +Cc: dev
Wednesday, March 21, 2018 9:26 PM, Ferruh Yigit:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
>
> > +
> > + if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
> > + configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
> > + }
>
> Not sure about changing the application configuration, and since this offload
> is not reported as supported application should not set it, if it does this
> should return an error.
Yes, any wrong offload configuration should fail the port/queue configuration with the proper error logging.
PMDs should not silently adopt to wrong configuration. This might lead the application to believe Rx checksum offload was enabled.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-21 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-22 6:26 ` Shahaf Shuler
@ 2018-03-26 7:30 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavan Nikhilesh @ 2018-03-26 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Shahaf Shuler, jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla; +Cc: dev
Hi Ferruh,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:25:57PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 3/8/2018 7:07 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> > Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Checkpatch reports falsepositive for PRIx64
> >
> > drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h | 3 ++
> > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
> > index b739c0b39..0448e3557 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
> > @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &conf->rxmode;
> > struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode = &conf->txmode;
> > struct octeontx_nic *nic = octeontx_pmd_priv(dev);
> > + uint64_t configured_offloads;
> > + uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
> > int ret;
> >
> > PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> > @@ -283,34 +285,43 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!rxmode->hw_strip_crc) {
> > + configured_offloads = rxmode->offloads;
> > +
> > + if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
> > - rxmode->hw_strip_crc = 1;
> > + configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
> > }
>
> Just as a heads up this will be changed in this release [1], CRC_STRIP will be
> the default behavior without requiring a flag.
Thanks for the heads up, will remove the flag.
>
> [1]
> https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/093255.html
>
> >
> > - if (rxmode->hw_ip_checksum) {
> > + if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
> > - rxmode->hw_ip_checksum = 0;
> > + configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
> > }
>
> No need to specific check for DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM, if it is not announced as
> supported below unsupported_offloads will cover it.
>
> >
> > - if (rxmode->split_hdr_size) {
> > - octeontx_log_err("rxmode does not support split header");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
> >
> > - if (rxmode->hw_vlan_filter) {
> > - octeontx_log_err("VLAN filter not supported");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
> > + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> > + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> > + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > }
> >
> > - if (rxmode->hw_vlan_extend) {
> > - octeontx_log_err("VLAN extended not supported");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + configured_offloads = txmode->offloads;
> > +
> > + if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
> > + configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
> > }
> >
> > - if (rxmode->enable_lro) {
> > - octeontx_log_err("LRO not supported");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
> > +
> > + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
> > + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
> > + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> > + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > }
> >
> > if (conf->link_speeds & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED) {
> > @@ -750,10 +761,11 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> > struct octeontx_txq *txq = NULL;
> > uint16_t dq_num;
> > int res = 0;
> > + uint64_t configured_offloads;
> > + uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
> >
> > RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
> > RTE_SET_USED(socket_id);
> > - RTE_SET_USED(tx_conf);
> >
> > dq_num = (nic->port_id * PKO_VF_NUM_DQ) + qidx;
> >
> > @@ -771,6 +783,17 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> > dev->data->tx_queues[qidx] = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > + configured_offloads = tx_conf->offloads;
> > +
> > + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
> > + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
> > + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
> > + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> > + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > + }
>
> There is a discussion about the requirement to have port offload in queue setup
> or not, more details in [2], any comment is welcome.
>
> [2]
> https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092978.html
> history: https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092862.html
>
> > +
> > /* Allocating tx queue data structure */
> > txq = rte_zmalloc_socket("ethdev TX queue", sizeof(struct octeontx_txq),
> > RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, nic->node);
> > @@ -826,6 +849,8 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> > uint8_t gaura;
> > unsigned int ev_queues = (nic->ev_queues * nic->port_id) + qidx;
> > unsigned int ev_ports = (nic->ev_ports * nic->port_id) + qidx;
> > + uint64_t configured_offloads;
> > + uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
> >
> > RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
> >
> > @@ -848,6 +873,27 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
> >
> > port = nic->port_id;
> >
> > + configured_offloads = rx_conf->offloads;
> > +
> > + if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
> > + configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
> > + }
>
> Same as above.
>
> > +
> > + if (configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
> > + configured_offloads &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM;
> > + }
>
> Not sure about changing the application configuration, and since this offload is
> not reported as supported application should not set it, if it does this should
> return an error.
Will fix it in v2.
>
> > +
> > + unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
> > +
> > + if (unsupported_offloads) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
> > + "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> > + unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
> > + (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > + }
> > /* Rx deferred start is not supported */
> > if (rx_conf->rx_deferred_start) {
> > octeontx_log_err("rx deferred start not supported");
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
> > index 10e42e142..9d6c22b0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
> > #define OCTEONTX_MAX_BGX_PORTS 4
> > #define OCTEONTX_MAX_LMAC_PER_BGX 4
> >
> > +#define OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP
> > +#define OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE
>
> These should be announced in dev_info as [rt]x_offload_capa, rx one seems missing.
If CRC strip is removed (implicit) then I think RX offload can be removed.
>
> > +
> > static inline struct octeontx_nic *
> > octeontx_pmd_priv(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.16.2
> >
>
Thanks,
Pavan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-08 19:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-03-11 18:14 ` santosh
2018-03-21 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-03-26 11:02 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-05 13:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-05 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Pavan Nikhilesh
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavan Nikhilesh @ 2018-03-26 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla, ferruh.yigit, shahafs; +Cc: dev, Pavan Nikhilesh
Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
index b739c0b39..3eb765eb1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &conf->rxmode;
struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode = &conf->txmode;
struct octeontx_nic *nic = octeontx_pmd_priv(dev);
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
int ret;
PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
@@ -283,34 +285,38 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!rxmode->hw_strip_crc) {
+ configured_offloads = rxmode->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
- rxmode->hw_strip_crc = 1;
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
}
- if (rxmode->hw_ip_checksum) {
- PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
- rxmode->hw_ip_checksum = 0;
- }
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
- if (rxmode->split_hdr_size) {
- octeontx_log_err("rxmode does not support split header");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
}
- if (rxmode->hw_vlan_filter) {
- octeontx_log_err("VLAN filter not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ configured_offloads = txmode->offloads;
- if (rxmode->hw_vlan_extend) {
- octeontx_log_err("VLAN extended not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
}
- if (rxmode->enable_lro) {
- octeontx_log_err("LRO not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
+
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
}
if (conf->link_speeds & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED) {
@@ -630,6 +636,7 @@ octeontx_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
dev_info->default_rxconf = (struct rte_eth_rxconf) {
.rx_free_thresh = 0,
.rx_drop_en = 0,
+ .offloads = OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS,
};
dev_info->default_txconf = (struct rte_eth_txconf) {
@@ -750,10 +757,11 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
struct octeontx_txq *txq = NULL;
uint16_t dq_num;
int res = 0;
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
RTE_SET_USED(socket_id);
- RTE_SET_USED(tx_conf);
dq_num = (nic->port_id * PKO_VF_NUM_DQ) + qidx;
@@ -771,6 +779,22 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
dev->data->tx_queues[qidx] = NULL;
}
+ configured_offloads = tx_conf->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
+ }
+
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
+
/* Allocating tx queue data structure */
txq = rte_zmalloc_socket("ethdev TX queue", sizeof(struct octeontx_txq),
RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, nic->node);
@@ -826,6 +850,8 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
uint8_t gaura;
unsigned int ev_queues = (nic->ev_queues * nic->port_id) + qidx;
unsigned int ev_ports = (nic->ev_ports * nic->port_id) + qidx;
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
@@ -848,6 +874,22 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
port = nic->port_id;
+ configured_offloads = rx_conf->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
+ }
+
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
+
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
/* Rx deferred start is not supported */
if (rx_conf->rx_deferred_start) {
octeontx_log_err("rx deferred start not supported");
diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
index 10e42e142..9d6c22b0d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
#define OCTEONTX_MAX_BGX_PORTS 4
#define OCTEONTX_MAX_LMAC_PER_BGX 4
+#define OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP
+#define OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE
+
static inline struct octeontx_nic *
octeontx_pmd_priv(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{
--
2.16.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-26 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Pavan Nikhilesh
@ 2018-04-05 13:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-04-05 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavan Nikhilesh, jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla, shahafs; +Cc: dev
On 3/26/2018 12:02 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
<...>
> @@ -630,6 +636,7 @@ octeontx_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> dev_info->default_rxconf = (struct rte_eth_rxconf) {
> .rx_free_thresh = 0,
> .rx_drop_en = 0,
> + .offloads = OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS,
> };
OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS need to be reported in "rx_offload_capa", currently
"rx_offload_capa" is zero, technically applications are not allowed to set any
Rx offloads.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-03-08 19:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs Pavan Nikhilesh
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-26 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Pavan Nikhilesh
@ 2018-04-05 13:23 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-05 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavan Nikhilesh @ 2018-04-05 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla, ferruh.yigit, shahafs; +Cc: dev, Pavan Nikhilesh
Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
---
v3 Changes:
- update dev_info rx_offload_capa to include OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS.
drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
index 90dd249a6..4d7d1d7f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.c
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &conf->rxmode;
struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode = &conf->txmode;
struct octeontx_nic *nic = octeontx_pmd_priv(dev);
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
int ret;
PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
@@ -283,34 +285,38 @@ octeontx_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!rxmode->hw_strip_crc) {
+ configured_offloads = rxmode->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
- rxmode->hw_strip_crc = 1;
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
}
- if (rxmode->hw_ip_checksum) {
- PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "rxcksum not supported");
- rxmode->hw_ip_checksum = 0;
- }
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
- if (rxmode->split_hdr_size) {
- octeontx_log_err("rxmode does not support split header");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
}
- if (rxmode->hw_vlan_filter) {
- octeontx_log_err("VLAN filter not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ configured_offloads = txmode->offloads;
- if (rxmode->hw_vlan_extend) {
- octeontx_log_err("VLAN extended not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
}
- if (rxmode->enable_lro) {
- octeontx_log_err("LRO not supported");
- return -EINVAL;
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
+
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
}
if (conf->link_speeds & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED) {
@@ -616,6 +622,7 @@ octeontx_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
dev_info->default_rxconf = (struct rte_eth_rxconf) {
.rx_free_thresh = 0,
.rx_drop_en = 0,
+ .offloads = OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS,
};
dev_info->default_txconf = (struct rte_eth_txconf) {
@@ -626,7 +633,8 @@ octeontx_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMS,
};
- dev_info->tx_offload_capa = DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
+ dev_info->rx_offload_capa = OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
+ dev_info->tx_offload_capa = OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
}
static void
@@ -736,10 +744,11 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
struct octeontx_txq *txq = NULL;
uint16_t dq_num;
int res = 0;
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
RTE_SET_USED(socket_id);
- RTE_SET_USED(tx_conf);
dq_num = (nic->port_id * PKO_VF_NUM_DQ) + qidx;
@@ -757,6 +766,22 @@ octeontx_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
dev->data->tx_queues[qidx] = NULL;
}
+ configured_offloads = tx_conf->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "cant disable lockfree tx");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
+ }
+
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS;
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported."
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 ".\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
+
/* Allocating tx queue data structure */
txq = rte_zmalloc_socket("ethdev TX queue", sizeof(struct octeontx_txq),
RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, nic->node);
@@ -812,6 +837,8 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
uint8_t gaura;
unsigned int ev_queues = (nic->ev_queues * nic->port_id) + qidx;
unsigned int ev_ports = (nic->ev_ports * nic->port_id) + qidx;
+ uint64_t configured_offloads;
+ uint64_t unsupported_offloads;
RTE_SET_USED(nb_desc);
@@ -834,6 +861,22 @@ octeontx_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qidx,
port = nic->port_id;
+ configured_offloads = rx_conf->offloads;
+
+ if (!(configured_offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "can't disable hw crc strip");
+ configured_offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
+ }
+
+ unsupported_offloads = configured_offloads & ~OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS;
+
+ if (unsupported_offloads) {
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads 0x%" PRIx64 " are not supported. "
+ "Requested 0x%" PRIx64 " supported 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ unsupported_offloads, configured_offloads,
+ (uint64_t)OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
/* Rx deferred start is not supported */
if (rx_conf->rx_deferred_start) {
octeontx_log_err("rx deferred start not supported");
diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
index 10e42e142..9d6c22b0d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/octeontx/octeontx_ethdev.h
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
#define OCTEONTX_MAX_BGX_PORTS 4
#define OCTEONTX_MAX_LMAC_PER_BGX 4
+#define OCTEONTX_RX_OFFLOADS DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP
+#define OCTEONTX_TX_OFFLOADS DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE
+
static inline struct octeontx_nic *
octeontx_pmd_priv(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{
--
2.16.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs
2018-04-05 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Pavan Nikhilesh
@ 2018-04-05 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-04-05 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavan Nikhilesh, jerin.jacob, santosh.shukla, shahafs; +Cc: dev
On 4/5/2018 2:23 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> Use the new Rx/Tx offload APIs and remove the old style offloads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-05 13:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-08 19:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx: use the new offload APIs Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-03-11 18:14 ` santosh
2018-03-21 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-22 6:26 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-03-26 7:30 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-03-26 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-05 13:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-05 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-05 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).