DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
	anatoly.burakov@intel.com, pmatilai@redhat.com,
	david.marchand@6wind.com, jia.guo@intel.com, matan@mellanox.com,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] kernel binding of devices + hotplug
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:11:01 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180418141101.GB2549@plex.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOaVG14YHng1N5XXkm1nBYKiR-rVzFrWgtsDK2Hc2yjT9ygGDw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 01:48:36AM +0000, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> My vote is to work with udev and not try to replace it.
> 
> Driverctl works well. Just not for bifurcated driver

I second that.  We also have other system configs to care about like
kernel parameters and hugepage configuration which I think follow the
same idea that they are system wide configs and should not be managed
by DPDK itself.

fbl


> 
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 9:31 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 
> > It's time to think (again) how we bind devices with kernel modules.
> > We need to decide how we want to manage hotplugged devices with DPDK.
> >
> > A bit of history first.
> > There was some code in DPDK for bind/unbind, but it has been removed
> > in DPDK 1.7 - http://dpdk.org/commit/5d8751b83
> > Copy of the commit message (in 2014):
> > "
> >         The bind/unbind operations should not be handled by the eal.
> >         These operations should be either done outside of dpdk or
> >         inside the PMDs themselves as these are their problems.
> > "
> >
> > The question raised at this time (4 years ago) is still under discussion.
> > Should we manage binding inside or outside DPDK?
> > Should it be controlled in the application or in the OS base?
> >
> > As you know, we use dpdk-devbind.py.
> > This tool lacks two major features:
> >         - persistent configuration
> >         - hotplug
> >
> > If we consider that the DPDK applications should be able to apply its own
> > policy to choose the devices to bind, then we need to implement binding
> > in the PMD (with EAL helpers).
> >
> > On the other hand, if we consider that it is the system responsibility,
> > then we could choose systemd/udev and driverctl.
> >
> > The debate is launched!
> >
> > Please find more details in the references below.
> >
> > Announce of driverctl:
> >         http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/029500.html
> > Repository of driverctl:
> >         https://gitlab.com/driverctl/driverctl
> >
> > Discussion about binding script and driverctl:
> >         http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-April/095687.html
> >
> > Patch to implement binding in DPDK (for hotplug):
> >         http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-April/095714.html
> >
> > Discussion in the same hotplug series:
> >         http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-April/097058.html
> >
> >
> >
> >

-- 
Flavio

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-18 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-13 16:31 Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-13 16:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-04-13 17:40   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-14 20:10     ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-16  8:31       ` Bruce Richardson
2018-04-16 16:11         ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-16 16:57           ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-16 17:10             ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-16 17:18               ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-16 17:32                 ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-16 17:50             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-17  9:23           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-17 10:42             ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-17 11:00               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-22 11:26                 ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-16  9:26       ` Guo, Jia
2018-04-16 16:11         ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-15  5:01   ` Wiles, Keith
2018-04-15  1:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-18 14:11   ` Flavio Leitner [this message]
2018-04-18 18:17     ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-18 18:54       ` Flavio Leitner
2018-04-19  6:04         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-04-19  8:24           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-19  8:40             ` Bruce Richardson
2018-04-19  9:47               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180418141101.GB2549@plex.lan \
    --to=fbl@redhat.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).