From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Tx fn selection when using new ethdev offloads
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 15:13:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180501141354.13935-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180501130309.39444-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
The Tx function selection code in the driver only used the older txq
flags values to check whether the scalar or vector functions should be
used. This caused performance regressions with testpmd io-fwd as the
scalar path rather than the vector one was being used in the default
case. Fix this by changing the code to take account of new offloads and
deleting the defines used for the old ones.
Fixes: 7497d3e2f777 ("net/i40e: convert to new Tx offloads API")
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
index ec1ce54ca..006f5b846 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
@@ -40,9 +40,6 @@
/* Base address of the HW descriptor ring should be 128B aligned. */
#define I40E_RING_BASE_ALIGN 128
-#define I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS ((uint32_t)ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS | \
- ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS)
-
#define I40E_TXD_CMD (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
@@ -2108,11 +2105,9 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup_runtime(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
dev->data->nb_tx_queues)) {
/**
* If it is the first queue to setup,
- * set all flags to default and call
+ * set all flags and call
* i40e_set_tx_function.
*/
- ad->tx_simple_allowed = true;
- ad->tx_vec_allowed = true;
i40e_set_tx_function_flag(dev, txq);
i40e_set_tx_function(dev);
return 0;
@@ -2128,9 +2123,8 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup_runtime(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
}
/* check simple tx conflict */
if (ad->tx_simple_allowed) {
- if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) !=
- I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) ||
- txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST) {
+ if (txq->offloads != 0 ||
+ txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST) {
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "No-simple tx is required.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -3080,18 +3074,21 @@ i40e_set_tx_function_flag(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data->dev_private);
/* Use a simple Tx queue (no offloads, no multi segs) if possible */
- if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) == I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS)
- && (txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST)) {
- if (txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ) {
- PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector tx"
- " can be enabled on this txq.");
-
- } else {
- ad->tx_vec_allowed = false;
- }
- } else {
- ad->tx_simple_allowed = false;
- }
+ ad->tx_simple_allowed = (txq->offloads == 0 &&
+ txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST);
+ ad->tx_vec_allowed = (ad->tx_simple_allowed &&
+ txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ);
+
+ if (ad->tx_vec_allowed)
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector Tx can be enabled on Tx queue %u.",
+ txq->queue_id);
+ else if (ad->tx_simple_allowed)
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Simple Tx can be enabled on Tx queue %u.",
+ txq->queue_id);
+ else
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
+ "Neither simple nor vector Tx enabled on Tx queue %u\n",
+ txq->queue_id);
}
void __attribute__((cold))
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-01 13:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 13:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-01 13:28 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 13:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-01 14:13 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2018-05-01 14:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-01 15:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-01 17:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-02 8:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-02 8:30 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180501141354.13935-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).