From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17331B642
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 04:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 20 Jun 2018 19:00:49 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,249,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="64993905"
Received: from dpdk51.sh.intel.com ([10.67.110.190])
 by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2018 19:00:48 -0700
From: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net,
	anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Cc: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
 ferruh.yigit@intel.com, benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com,
 narender.vangati@intel.com, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:00:51 +0800
Message-Id: <20180621020059.1198-15-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6
In-Reply-To: <20180621020059.1198-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
References: <20180607123849.14439-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <20180621020059.1198-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 14/22] net/failsafe: enable port detach on
	secondary process
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 02:01:52 -0000

Previously, detach port on secondary process will mess primary
process and cause same device can't be attached again, by take
advantage of rte_eth_release_port_private, we can support this
with minor change.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c
index eafbb75df..c5e8651f6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c
@@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ rte_pmd_failsafe_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev)
 		}
 		/* TODO: request info from primary to set up Rx and Tx */
 		eth_dev->dev_ops = &failsafe_ops;
+		eth_dev->device = &vdev->device;
 		rte_eth_dev_probing_finish(eth_dev);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -338,10 +339,25 @@ rte_pmd_failsafe_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev)
 static int
 rte_pmd_failsafe_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev)
 {
+	struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
 	const char *name;
 
 	name = rte_vdev_device_name(vdev);
 	INFO("Uninitializing " FAILSAFE_DRIVER_NAME " for %s", name);
+
+	eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(name);
+	if (!eth_dev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
+		/* detach device on local pprocess only */
+		if (strlen(rte_vdev_device_args(vdev)) == 0)
+			return rte_eth_dev_release_port_private(eth_dev);
+		/**
+		 * else this is a private device for current process
+		 * so continue with normal detach scenario.
+		 */
+	}
+
 	return fs_rte_eth_free(name);
 }
 
-- 
2.13.6