From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEE2568A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Jul 2018 07:44:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 01 Jul 2018 22:44:33 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,298,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="53378989"
Received: from dpdk51.sh.intel.com ([10.67.110.190])
 by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2018 22:44:32 -0700
From: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net,
	anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Cc: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
 ferruh.yigit@intel.com, benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com,
 narender.vangati@intel.com, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Mon,  2 Jul 2018 13:44:40 +0800
Message-Id: <20180702054450.29269-10-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6
In-Reply-To: <20180702054450.29269-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
References: <20180607123849.14439-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <20180702054450.29269-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/19] net/af_packet: enable port detach on
	secondary process
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 05:44:34 -0000

Previously, detach port on secondary process will mess primary
process and cause same device can't be attached again, by take
advantage of rte_eth_release_port_private, we can support this
with minor change.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c b/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
index ea47abbf8..33ac19de8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
@@ -935,6 +935,7 @@ rte_pmd_af_packet_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
 		}
 		/* TODO: request info from primary to set up Rx and Tx */
 		eth_dev->dev_ops = &ops;
+		eth_dev->device = &dev->device;
 		rte_eth_dev_probing_finish(eth_dev);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -986,6 +987,16 @@ rte_pmd_af_packet_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
 	if (eth_dev == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
+	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
+		/* detach device on local pprocess only */
+		if (strlen(rte_vdev_device_args(dev)) == 0)
+			return rte_eth_dev_release_port_private(eth_dev);
+		/**
+		 * else this is a private device for current process
+		 * so continue with normal detach scenario
+		 */
+	}
+
 	internals = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
 	for (q = 0; q < internals->nb_queues; q++) {
 		rte_free(internals->rx_queue[q].rd);
-- 
2.13.6