From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org, "Kulasek,
TomaszX" <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>,
"yliu@fridaylinux.org" <yliu@fridaylinux.org>,
"Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: fix wait for valid descriptor
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:11:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727061146.GA2066@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30052203.PRpXP6jO5E@xps>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 05:48:04PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> What is the status of this patch?
>
>
> 11/02/2018 05:21, Tan, Jianfeng:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kulasek
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 1:35 AM
> > > To: yliu@fridaylinux.org
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com; stable@dpdk.org; Liu,
> > > Changpeng
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: fix wait for valid descriptor
> > >
> > > For each virt queue's kickfd and callfd, there are 2 invalid
> > > status: VIRTIO_UNINITIALIZED_EVENTFD and VIRTIO_INVALID_EVENTFD.
> > > Don't set the virt queue to ready status until got the valid
> > > descriptor.
> >
> > Cannot remember why we introduce two invalid status.
> >
> > If we treat "VIRTIO_INVALID_EVENTFD" as an indicator to judge if device is ready, then defining one status (invalid) is enough.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jianfeng
> >
> > >
> > > This is safe for polling mode drivers in Guest OS, the backend
> > > vhost process will not post notification to interrupt vector for
> > > PMD mode in guest, but the interrupt vector still valid.
> > >
> > > Fixes: e049ca6d10e0 ("vhost-user: prepare multiple queue setup")
This fixes line isn't right. It's the below commit [1]
that introduced the code changed by this patch. The code
was written in this way intentionally by that commit.
With a quick glance at that commit, it seems that this
patch isn't valid.
[1] https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=fb871d0a4dc1c038a381c524cdb86fe83d21d842
commit fb871d0a4dc1c038a381c524cdb86fe83d21d842
Author: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Date: Mon Mar 14 17:53:32 2016 +0900
vhost: fix default value of kickfd and callfd
Currently, default values of kickfd and callfd are -1.
If the values are -1, current code guesses kickfd and callfd haven't
been initialized yet. Then vhost library will guess the virtqueue isn't
ready for processing.
But callfd and kickfd will be set as -1 when "--enable-kvm"
isn't specified in QEMU command line. It means we cannot treat -1 as
uninitialized state.
The patch defines -1 and -2 as VIRTIO_INVALID_EVENTFD and
VIRTIO_UNINITIALIZED_EVENTFD, and uses VIRTIO_UNINITIALIZED_EVENTFD for
the default values of kickfd and callfd.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> > > index 65ee33919..4508f697b 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> > > @@ -766,7 +766,9 @@ vq_is_ready(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > {
> > > return vq && vq->desc && vq->avail && vq->used &&
> > > vq->kickfd != VIRTIO_UNINITIALIZED_EVENTFD &&
> > > - vq->callfd != VIRTIO_UNINITIALIZED_EVENTFD;
> > > + vq->callfd != VIRTIO_UNINITIALIZED_EVENTFD &&
> > > + vq->kickfd != VIRTIO_INVALID_EVENTFD &&
> > > + vq->callfd != VIRTIO_INVALID_EVENTFD;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int
> > > --
> > > 2.14.1
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 17:34 Tomasz Kulasek
2018-02-11 4:21 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-07-26 15:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-27 6:11 ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180727061146.GA2066@debian \
--to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
--cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).