From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com (mail-pg1-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E969D548B for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:59:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id y5-v6so3487140pgv.1 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:59:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PMQ1ykveO8Ukqeu6ofcVE/hPM14A01QNLV9qLEh++Gs=; b=MJFZy/nrZurw3MTZED8tlL5Io2G3YoArZLV2LVOqi6kyITwBLFSOtc3w3G3EvclQLP MLN99s8G96e2tb0i2STSUn2es/EbYlmx3ijuPf+ZrwEGrTPlPE3rQTmfu+y4nRe3cfgH wjP0/4XSWwX+HmJC+p2B5CLp2Ql/CxVkUg97Y1KBMDTxQXMrteaZ2gkvh8+TgB26u9wA 3djOqYfA36J28gaDHHDwJ3r+ZfiJ+Z8P02DRm2e1j1VbM9asczhf14Fzr35tOhg/hWnP cQxBVQZsc9mMBCpGhy6g92uIhxU6R0A7G7ngu0Hc+NkG7toxM3CO4DVNst272CltcB8b VAVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PMQ1ykveO8Ukqeu6ofcVE/hPM14A01QNLV9qLEh++Gs=; b=AjCUedUcwJlvf7SB/9Lc+yJlnE6nYYzbwsikU7ruk4XqDQ6Chpj3qOIHMCsA4mj2Vx cQWCCrkzCXD1HBRNFJ7qih2eizcWnsRRow1WyOCEDvVTkHsDVW3l9dxjswd63QRUwIO1 L3teN2tknHSwh38lRpOX9DQ75LozJ1GRPFdPci/g2nvIEwvfC2doHrxIIn3gQChhvM9Q acj+xhLofeLkUQPaI2U07e1j0jlPKnDdCD2LmrCFJbAabfV5l/CnBg35kcuwjOnqRUFN 6v5ZTGoSFhSYi7/lGi8t9hJ0ODh9l4HuLvqQoB/pwmBynCnyY3cUVlFzBhc0hK7KWCLl K5yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH4JsOI8iNGGYfh3h3lSojmjve8SSxsd2dkX3fNJ7mxBJPIrRxn RrlpCZNHIKenfXDIrfece9jObQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcENxcPiuK2NUmUdN7jLJCbquXb5TCpUWumLP7RmSkXKzPoYOisJqWVofX1qCWz1dAi807v1A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ba43:: with SMTP id l3-v6mr6427800pgu.295.1532707193000; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3-v6sm15410546pfi.24.2018.07.27.08.59.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:59:50 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Eads, Gage" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Olivier Matz Message-ID: <20180727085950.2e2e0281@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <7441138.EijKcuSYIv@xps> References: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E446E9A79@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E446F214F@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> <7441138.EijKcuSYIv@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK and forked processes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:59:56 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:03:48 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 27/07/2018 15:46, Eads, Gage: > > As this discussion has broad implications for DPDK, is it a good candidate for a techboard meeting topic? > > We can discuss it in techboard, but usually we prefer discussing topics > whose resolution is not clear. > In this case, I think everybody agree with Anatoly, isn't it? I would prefer that decisions like this be done by rough consensus on the mailing list. As far as applications messing with internals, in reality any application can change anything. Just don't come crying to DPDK community for help.