From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomasm@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ppc64: fix compilation of when AltiVec is enabled
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 11:29:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180903092911.GU3695@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830115959.28935-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Hi Christian,
Couldn't follow up on this last week, however I still have some concerns and
comments, please see below.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:59:59PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> The definition of almost any newer standard like --stc=c11 will drop
> __APPLCE_ALTIVEC__ which otherwise would be defined.
> If that is the case then altivec.h will redefine bool to a type
> conflicting with those defined by stdbool.h.
>
> This breaks compilation of 18.08 on ppc64 like:
> mlx5_nl_flow.c:407:17: error: incompatible types when assigning
> to type ‘__vector __bool int’ {aka ‘__vector(4) __bool int’}
> from type ‘int’ in_port_id_set = false;
>
> Other alternatives were pursued on [1] but they always ended up being
> more complex than what would be appropriate for the issue we face.
>
> [1]: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-August/109926.html
>
> Tested-by: Takeshi T Yoshimura <TYOS@jp.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> ---
> .../common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_memcpy.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_memcpy.h
> index 75f74897b..0b3b89b56 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_memcpy.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_memcpy.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,17 @@
> #include <string.h>
> /*To include altivec.h, GCC version must >= 4.8 */
> #include <altivec.h>
> +/*
> + * Compilation workaround for PPC64 targets when AltiVec is fully
> + * enabled e.g. with std=c11. Otherwise there would be a type conflict
> + * of "bool" between stdbool and altivec.
> + */
> +#if defined(__PPC64__) && !defined(__APPLE_ALTIVEC__)
> + #undef bool
> + /* redefine as in stdbool.h */
> + #define bool _Bool
> +#endif
> +
The above will break existing C++ programs that include rte_memcpy.h.
Problem is that bool is an actual C++ type. C99 has _Bool which doesn't
exist in C++ along with a bool macro that appears only after including
stdbool.h.
To make things worse, nothing prevents C++ programs from importing a C-style
bool macro by including stdbool.h (or cstdbool).
Enclosing it in #ifdef __cplusplus won't help because you never know what
bool is supposed to be in the first place as it depends on how applications
are written. I think something like this prior suggestion [1]
(saving/restoring bool) is the only way to deal with that in a safe-ish
fashion.
Pending something better, the above #undef/#define workaround is only safe
to use inside mlx5 PMD code that triggers the compilation issue. It must not
be found in a public header.
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C" {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
[1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-August/110401.html
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-03 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 11:59 Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-31 1:48 ` Chao Zhu
2018-08-31 5:14 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-31 7:59 ` Chao Zhu
2018-09-03 9:29 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2018-11-05 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix build on PPC64 Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07 19:05 ` dwilder
2018-11-07 21:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-08 8:25 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-11-08 9:46 ` ´ð¸´: " Chao Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180903092911.GU3695@6wind.com \
--to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=thomasm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).