From: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net, declan.doherty@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update API deprecation for device reset
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:04:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180910140437.6741-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
Device reset may have the dependency, for example, a VF reset expects
PF ready, or a NIC function as a part of a SOC need to wait for other
parts of the system be ready, these are time-consuming tasks and will
block current thread.
So we claimed rte_eth_dev_reset as an async API, that makes things
easy for an application that what to reset the device from the interrupt
thread since typically a RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET handler is invoked
in interrupt thread.
RFC patch:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/44513/
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index bade1e4c4..3490aac87 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -95,3 +95,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
- ``rte_pdump_set_socket_dir`` will be removed;
- The parameter, ``path``, of ``rte_pdump_init`` will be removed;
- The enum ``rte_pdump_socktype`` will be removed.
+
+* ethdev: In v19.02 ``rte_eth_dev_reset`` is claimed as an async API.
+ Application should not assume device reset is finished after
+ ``rte_eth_dev_reset`` return, it should always wait for a
+ RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event and check the reset result.
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-10 14:04 Qi Zhang [this message]
2018-09-10 15:24 ` Kevin Traynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180910140437.6741-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).