From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, matias.elo@nokia.com,
Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] event: add function for reading unlink in progress
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:16:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912161616.42306-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> (raw)
This commit introduces a new function in the eventdev API,
which allows applications to read the number of unlink requests
in progress on a particular port of an eventdev instance.
This information allows applications to verify when no more packets
from a particular queue (or any queue) will arrive at a port.
The application could decide to stop polling, or put the core into
a sleep state if it wishes, as it is ensured that no new packets
will arrive at a particular port anymore if all queues are unlinked.
Suggested-by: Matias Elo <matias.elo@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
---
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
Hey, I've added this API as __rte_experimental, so we should be OK to
include in 18.11, and then possibly remove the experimental tag in
a later release, assuming it serves its purpose correctly.
For context, see thread here:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-September/111499.html
@Matias, is that workable for you?
@Jerin, is this acceptable as maintainer?
Cheers, -Harry
---
lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 22 +++++++++++++++
lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++--
lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h | 19 +++++++++++++
lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
index 801810edd..0a8572b7b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
@@ -980,6 +980,28 @@ rte_event_port_unlink(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id,
return diag;
}
+int __rte_experimental
+rte_event_port_unlinks_in_progress(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id)
+{
+ struct rte_eventdev *dev;
+
+ RTE_EVENTDEV_VALID_DEVID_OR_ERR_RET(dev_id, -EINVAL);
+ dev = &rte_eventdevs[dev_id];
+ if (!is_valid_port(dev, port_id)) {
+ RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid port_id=%" PRIu8, port_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Return 0 if the PMD does not implement unlinks in progress.
+ * This allows PMDs which handle unlink synchronously to not implement
+ * this function at all.
+ */
+ RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->port_unlinks_in_progress, 0);
+
+ return (*dev->dev_ops->port_unlinks_in_progress)(dev,
+ dev->data->ports[port_id]);
+}
+
int
rte_event_port_links_get(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id,
uint8_t queues[], uint8_t priorities[])
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
index b6fd6ee7f..d07e297bc 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
@@ -1656,8 +1656,9 @@ rte_event_port_link(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id,
* event port designated by its *port_id* on the event device designated
* by its *dev_id*.
*
- * The unlink establishment shall disable the event port *port_id* from
- * receiving events from the specified event queue *queue_id*
+ * The unlink call issues an async request to disable the event port *port_id*
+ * from receiving events from the specified event queue *queue_id*. See
+ * *rte_event_port_unlinks_in_progress* to poll for completed unlinks.
*
* Event queue(s) to event port unlink establishment can be changed at runtime
* without re-configuring the device.
@@ -1694,6 +1695,29 @@ int
rte_event_port_unlink(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id,
uint8_t queues[], uint16_t nb_unlinks);
+/**
+ * Returns the number of unlinks in progress.
+ *
+ * This function provides the application with a method to detect when an
+ * unlink has been completed by the implementation. See *rte_event_port_unlink*
+ * on how to issue unlink requests.
+ *
+ * @param dev_id
+ * The indentifier of the device.
+ *
+ * @param port_id
+ * Event port identifier to select port to check for unlinks in progress.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * The number of unlinks that are in progress. A return of zero indicates that
+ * there are no outstanding unlink requests. A positive return value indicates
+ * the number of unlinks that are in progress, but are not yet complete.
+ * A negative return value indicates an error, -EINVAL indicates an invalid
+ * parameter passed for *dev_id* or *port_id*.
+ */
+int __rte_experimental
+rte_event_port_unlinks_in_progress(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id);
+
/**
* Retrieve the list of source event queues and its associated service priority
* linked to the destination event port designated by its *port_id*
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h
index 3fbb4d2b2..65645730a 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h
@@ -332,6 +332,23 @@ typedef int (*eventdev_port_link_t)(struct rte_eventdev *dev, void *port,
typedef int (*eventdev_port_unlink_t)(struct rte_eventdev *dev, void *port,
uint8_t queues[], uint16_t nb_unlinks);
+/**
+ * Unlinks in progress. Returns number of unlinks that the PMD is currently
+ * performing, but have not yet been completed.
+ *
+ * @param dev
+ * Event device pointer
+ *
+ * @param port
+ * Event port pointer
+ *
+ * @return
+ * Returns the number of in-progress unlinks. Zero is returned if none are
+ * in progress.
+ */
+typedef int (*eventdev_port_unlinks_in_progress_t)(struct rte_eventdev *dev,
+ void *port);
+
/**
* Converts nanoseconds to *timeout_ticks* value for rte_event_dequeue()
*
@@ -815,6 +832,8 @@ struct rte_eventdev_ops {
/**< Link event queues to an event port. */
eventdev_port_unlink_t port_unlink;
/**< Unlink event queues from an event port. */
+ eventdev_port_unlinks_in_progress_t port_unlinks_in_progress;
+ /**< Unlinks in progress on an event port. */
eventdev_dequeue_timeout_ticks_t timeout_ticks;
/**< Converts ns to *timeout_ticks* value for rte_event_dequeue() */
eventdev_dump_t dump;
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map
index 12835e9f2..24e7a45c0 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_event_crypto_adapter_stats_reset;
rte_event_crypto_adapter_stop;
rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_cb_register;
+ rte_event_port_unlinks_in_progress;
rte_event_timer_adapter_caps_get;
rte_event_timer_adapter_create;
rte_event_timer_adapter_create_ext;
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 16:16 Harry van Haaren [this message]
2018-09-12 16:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] event/sw: implement unlinks in progress function Harry van Haaren
2018-09-12 16:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] event/sw: add unit test for unlinks in progress Harry van Haaren
2018-09-13 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] event: add function for reading unlink " Jerin Jacob
2018-09-18 12:05 ` Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
2018-09-20 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Harry van Haaren
2018-09-20 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] event/sw: implement unlinks in progress function Harry van Haaren
2018-09-23 11:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-20 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] event/sw: add unit test for unlinks in progress Harry van Haaren
2018-09-24 8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] event: add function for reading unlink " Harry van Haaren
2018-09-24 8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] event/sw: implement unlinks in progress function Harry van Haaren
2018-09-24 8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] event/sw: add unit test for unlinks in progress Harry van Haaren
2018-09-24 14:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] event: add function for reading unlink " Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180912161616.42306-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=matias.elo@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).