DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: matias.elo@nokia.com,
	Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] event/sw: fix cq idx check for unlink usecases
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:25:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180921102510.24179-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> (raw)

This commit fixes the cq index checks when unlinking
ports/queues while the scheduler core is running.
Previously, the == comparison could be "skipped" if
in particular corner cases. With the check being changed
to >= this is resolved as the cq idx gets reset to zero.

Bugzilla ID: 60
Fixes: 617995dfc5b2 ("event/sw: add scheduling logic")

Suggested-by: Matias Elo <matias.elo@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>

---

Cc: stable@dpdk.org

@Matias,

When testing this patch with your provided test case as per attachment
to bug #60 in Bugzilla, I don't see any events arriving to port 0.
Hence, I believe this to be the correct behaviour, if you can confirm
that'd be awesome!

Regards, -Harry

---
 drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c
index e3a41e02f..fb5d44630 100644
--- a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c
@@ -51,9 +51,11 @@ sw_schedule_atomic_to_cq(struct sw_evdev *sw, struct sw_qid * const qid,
 		int cq = fid->cq;
 
 		if (cq < 0) {
-			uint32_t cq_idx = qid->cq_next_tx++;
-			if (qid->cq_next_tx == qid->cq_num_mapped_cqs)
+			uint32_t cq_idx;
+			if (qid->cq_next_tx >= qid->cq_num_mapped_cqs)
 				qid->cq_next_tx = 0;
+			cq_idx = qid->cq_next_tx++;
+
 			cq = qid->cq_map[cq_idx];
 
 			/* find least used */
@@ -140,9 +142,10 @@ sw_schedule_parallel_to_cq(struct sw_evdev *sw, struct sw_qid * const qid,
 		do {
 			if (++cq_check_count > qid->cq_num_mapped_cqs)
 				goto exit;
-			cq = qid->cq_map[cq_idx];
-			if (++cq_idx == qid->cq_num_mapped_cqs)
+			if (cq_idx >= qid->cq_num_mapped_cqs)
 				cq_idx = 0;
+			cq = qid->cq_map[cq_idx++];
+
 		} while (rte_event_ring_free_count(
 				sw->ports[cq].cq_worker_ring) == 0 ||
 				sw->ports[cq].inflights == SW_PORT_HIST_LIST);
@@ -220,7 +223,7 @@ sw_schedule_qid_to_cq(struct sw_evdev *sw)
 		int iq_num = PKT_MASK_TO_IQ(qid->iq_pkt_mask);
 
 		/* zero mapped CQs indicates directed */
-		if (iq_num >= SW_IQS_MAX)
+		if (iq_num >= SW_IQS_MAX || qid->cq_num_mapped_cqs == 0)
 			continue;
 
 		uint32_t pkts_done = 0;
-- 
2.17.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-21 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21 10:25 Harry van Haaren [this message]
2018-09-21 12:17 ` Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
2018-09-23 11:27   ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180921102510.24179-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matias.elo@nokia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).