From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6421B4EE; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:38:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2018 03:38:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,399,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="89572724" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2018 03:38:30 -0700 Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (sivswdev01.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.45]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id w9JAcUqS004983; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:38:30 +0100 Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id w9JAcUbr030830; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:38:30 +0100 Received: (from lma25@localhost) by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with LOCAL id w9JAcU8b030826; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:38:30 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:38:30 +0100 From: "Liang, Ma" To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Qian Xu , dpdk-dev , dpdk-test-report Message-ID: <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:38:34 -0000 Hi Thomas, I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh. that script still put '+' as the Section name. any suggestion ? I use fedora 24 and gawk Regards Liang On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit: > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me. > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working. > > I have just restarted it. > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with > the new check in checkpatches.sh. > >