From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lma25@ecsmtp.ir.intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D6E1B4E8;
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:45:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 19 Oct 2018 03:45:35 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,399,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="101562108"
Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2018 03:45:33 -0700
Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (sivswdev01.ir.intel.com
 [10.237.217.45])
 by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id
 w9JAjXxK006986; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:45:33 +0100
Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id w9JAjX9s003978;
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:45:33 +0100
Received: (from lma25@localhost)
 by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with LOCAL id w9JAjXnA003974;
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:45:33 +0100
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:45:33 +0100
From: "Liang, Ma" <liang.j.ma@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Qian Xu <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
 dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk-test-report <test-report@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20181019104532.GB1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com>
References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com>
 <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com>
 <2975014.4ik6Sx9Qhf@xps>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2975014.4ik6Sx9Qhf@xps>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:45:37 -0000


I did send out a patch to the author for a while. but no response. 
FYI  http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/46101/

Liang

On 19 Oct 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script.
> 
> 19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >    I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
> >    that script still put '+' as the Section name.
> >    any suggestion ?
> >    I use fedora 24 and gawk
> > Regards
> > Liang
> > 
> > On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
> > > 
> > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
> > > 
> > > I have just restarted it.
> > > 
> > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> > > the new check in checkpatches.sh.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>