From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C361B4E2 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [107.15.85.130] (helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1gDDDN-0005GC-7g; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:40:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 07:38:16 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Liang Ma Message-ID: <20181019113815.GA30254@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <1538666296-25742-1-git-send-email-liang.j.ma@intel.com> <5107033.R7BcetJnk1@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5107033.R7BcetJnk1@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools/check-symbol-changes.sh: awk script issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:38:38 -0000 On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:48:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Are you OK with this patch? > > > 04/10/2018 17:18, Liang Ma: > > There is a issue inside check-symbol-changes.sh awk script. > > When the script try to parse the section name from patch, > > The script put char "+" into the section name. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Ma > > --- > > devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh > > index c0d2a6d..4a0f4d8 100755 > > --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh > > +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ build_map_changes() > > # the rest of the line with the + and { symbols remvoed. > > # Triggering this rule sets in_sec to 1, which actives the > > # symbol rule below > > - /^.*{/ { > > + /^[^-+]*{/ { > > if (in_map == 1) { > > sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1; > > } > > > > I don't think so. The section name might get a + in front of it on lines like this: +EXPERIMENTAL { But the above change just skips matching on it, which I don't think is what we want. The right fix I think would be to match on it, then strip the leading plus with a sed operation in the body of the match rule. Neil