DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid memory barriers when no descriptors dequeued
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:39:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181023123903.dagzx72lrs2guwhv@jenstp.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181023100710.14739-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:07:10PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>In both split and packed dequeue paths, flush_shadow_used_ring
>and vhost_ring_call variants gets called even if not packets
>have been dequeued, and so no descriptors updates happened.
>
>It has an impact on CPU pipeline, as memory barriers are used
>in these functions.
>
>This patch don't call these functions if no descriptors have
>been dequeued. The performance gain with split ring when
>dequeue zero-copy is disabled should be null, but should be
>noticeable with packed ring or dequeue zero-copy enabled.

I tried this with packed ring pmd patch series v8 and it works fine.
It doesn't hurt performance either, I see improvements in sending
packets from guest to host. 

Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com> 
Tested-by: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>

regards,
Jens 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-23 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-23 10:07 [dpdk-dev] " Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-23 12:39 ` Jens Freimann [this message]
2018-10-24  8:50 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-24 10:51 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181023123903.dagzx72lrs2guwhv@jenstp.localdomain \
    --to=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).