DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] net/virtio: implement receive path for packed queues
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:54:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181025135416.n3ti672qpmoqthgg@jenstp.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181025093909.GF22179@debian>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:39:09PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:32:34PM +0200, Jens Freimann wrote:
>> Implement the receive part.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c |  18 +-
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h |   2 +
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c   | 280 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.c     |  22 +++
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h     |   2 +-
>>  5 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> index d2118e6a9..7f81d24aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> @@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ virtio_init_queue(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx)
>>  	vq->hw = hw;
>>  	vq->vq_queue_index = vtpci_queue_idx;
>>  	vq->vq_nentries = vq_size;
>> -	if (vtpci_packed_queue(hw))
>> +	if (vtpci_packed_queue(hw)) {
>>  		vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter = 1;
>> +		vq->vq_ring.used_wrap_counter = 1;
>
>Why just use used_wrap_counter in receive path?

You mean add it in a previous patch?

>
>> +	}
>>
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Reserve a memzone for vring elements
>> @@ -1326,7 +1328,13 @@ set_rxtx_funcs(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct virtio_hw *hw = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
>>
>> -	if (hw->use_simple_rx) {
>> +	if (vtpci_packed_queue(hw)) {
>> +		if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>> +			eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = &virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts;
>> +		} else {
>> +		eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = &virtio_recv_pkts_packed;
>
>The indent is wrong.

ok

>
>> +		}
>> +	} else if (hw->use_simple_rx) {
>
>Please make the structure more clear, e.g.
>
>	if (vtpci_packed_queue(hw)) {
>		// packed ring
>	} else {
>		// split ring
>	}

ok

>
>>  		PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "virtio: using simple Rx path on port %u",
>>  			eth_dev->data->port_id);
>>  		eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = virtio_recv_pkts_vec;
>> @@ -1490,7 +1498,8 @@ virtio_init_device(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint64_t req_features)
>>
>>  	/* Setting up rx_header size for the device */
>>  	if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) ||
>> -	    vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
>> +	    vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) ||
>> +	    vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED))
>>  		hw->vtnet_hdr_size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf);
>>  	else
>>  		hw->vtnet_hdr_size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr);
>> @@ -1918,7 +1927,8 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>
>>  	rte_spinlock_init(&hw->state_lock);
>>
>> -	hw->use_simple_rx = 1;
>> +	if (!vtpci_packed_queue(hw))
>> +		hw->use_simple_rx = 1;
>>
>>  	if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {
>>  		hw->use_inorder_tx = 1;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
>> index 05d355180..6c9247639 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
>> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ int virtio_dev_tx_queue_setup_finish(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>
>>  uint16_t virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>  		uint16_t nb_pkts);
>> +uint16_t virtio_recv_pkts_packed(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>> +		uint16_t nb_pkts);
>>
>>  uint16_t virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>  		uint16_t nb_pkts);
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> index 837457243..42702527c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>  #include "virtqueue.h"
>>  #include "virtio_rxtx.h"
>>  #include "virtio_rxtx_simple.h"
>> +#include "virtio_ring.h"
>>
>>  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_DUMP
>>  #define VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, len) rte_pktmbuf_dump(stdout, m, len)
>> @@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ vq_ring_free_chain(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t desc_idx)
>>  }
>>
>>  void
>> -vq_ring_free_chain_packed(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t desc_idx, used_idx)
>> +vq_ring_free_chain_packed(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t desc_idx, uint16_t used_idx)
>>  {
>>  	struct vring_desc_packed *dp;
>>  	struct vq_desc_extra *dxp = NULL, *dxp_tail = NULL;
>> @@ -102,7 +103,6 @@ vq_ring_free_chain_packed(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t desc_idx, used_idx)
>>  	if ((dp->flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) == 0) {
>>  		while (dp->flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT && i < dxp->ndescs) {
>>  			desc_idx_last = dxp->next;
>> -			dp = &vq->vq_ring.desc_packed[dxp->next];
>
>Why above line was added before this patch?

rebase mistake, will fix.

>
>>  			dxp = &vq->vq_descx[dxp->next];
>>  			i++;
>>  		}
>> @@ -124,6 +124,47 @@ vq_ring_free_chain_packed(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t desc_idx, used_idx)
>>  	dxp->next = VQ_RING_DESC_CHAIN_END;
>>  }
>>
>> +static uint16_t
>> +virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx_packed(struct virtqueue *vq,
>> +				  struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>> +				  uint32_t *len,
>> +				  uint16_t num)
>> +{
>> +	struct rte_mbuf *cookie;
>> +	uint16_t used_idx;
>> +	uint16_t id;
>> +	struct vring_desc_packed *desc;
>> +	uint16_t i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> +		used_idx = vq->vq_used_cons_idx;
>> +		desc = (struct vring_desc_packed *) vq->vq_ring.desc_packed;
>> +		if (!desc_is_used(&desc[used_idx], &vq->vq_ring))
>> +			return i;
>> +		len[i] = desc[used_idx].len;
>> +		id = desc[used_idx].index;
>> +		cookie = (struct rte_mbuf *)vq->vq_descx[id].cookie;
>> +
>> +		if (unlikely(cookie == NULL)) {
>> +			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "vring descriptor with no mbuf cookie at %u",
>> +				vq->vq_used_cons_idx);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +		rte_prefetch0(cookie);
>> +		rte_packet_prefetch(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(cookie, void *));
>> +		rx_pkts[i] = cookie;
>> +		vq_ring_free_chain_packed(vq, id, used_idx);
>> +
>> +		vq->vq_used_cons_idx += vq->vq_descx[id].ndescs;
>> +		if (vq->vq_used_cons_idx >= vq->vq_nentries) {
>> +			vq->vq_used_cons_idx -= vq->vq_nentries;
>> +			vq->vq_ring.used_wrap_counter ^= 1;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return i;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static uint16_t
>>  virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>>  			   uint32_t *len, uint16_t num)
>> @@ -369,6 +410,55 @@ virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline int
>> +virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_packed(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie)
>> +{
>> +	struct vq_desc_extra *dxp;
>> +	struct virtio_hw *hw = vq->hw;
>> +	struct vring_desc_packed *start_dp;
>> +	uint16_t needed = 1;
>> +	uint16_t head_idx, idx;
>> +	uint16_t flags;
>> +
>> +	if (unlikely(vq->vq_free_cnt == 0))
>> +		return -ENOSPC;
>> +	if (unlikely(vq->vq_free_cnt < needed))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	head_idx = vq->vq_desc_head_idx;
>> +	if (unlikely(head_idx >= vq->vq_nentries))
>> +		return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> +	idx = head_idx;
>> +	dxp = &vq->vq_descx[idx];
>> +	dxp->cookie = (void *)cookie;
>> +	dxp->ndescs = needed;
>> +
>> +	start_dp = vq->vq_ring.desc_packed;
>> +	start_dp[idx].addr =
>> +		VIRTIO_MBUF_ADDR(cookie, vq) +
>> +		RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM - hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
>> +	start_dp[idx].len =
>> +		cookie->buf_len - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
>> +	flags = VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
>> +	flags |= VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL(vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter) |
>> +		 VRING_DESC_F_USED(!vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter);
>> +	rte_smp_wmb();
>> +	start_dp[idx].flags = flags;
>> +	idx = dxp->next;
>
>We should always use the descriptors in packed ring in the
>ring order (we have to use the elements in vq_descx[] out
>of order if device processes descriptors out of order).

Yes, I think you're right. I'll try to fix it.

>
>> +	vq->vq_desc_head_idx = idx;
>> +	if (vq->vq_desc_head_idx == VQ_RING_DESC_CHAIN_END)
>> +		vq->vq_desc_tail_idx = idx;
>> +	vq->vq_free_cnt = (uint16_t)(vq->vq_free_cnt - needed);
>> +
>> +	vq->vq_avail_idx += needed;
>> +	if (vq->vq_avail_idx >= vq->vq_nentries) {
>> +		vq->vq_avail_idx = 0;
>> +		vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter ^= 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>[...]
>>  uint16_t
>>  virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts_inorder(void *rx_queue,
>>  			struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>> @@ -1385,12 +1582,20 @@ virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts(void *rx_queue,
>>  	uint16_t extra_idx;
>>  	uint32_t seg_res;
>>  	uint32_t hdr_size;
>> +	uint32_t rx_num = 0;
>>
>>  	nb_rx = 0;
>>  	if (unlikely(hw->started == 0))
>>  		return nb_rx;
>>
>> -	nb_used = VIRTQUEUE_NUSED(vq);
>> +	if (vtpci_packed_queue(vq->hw)) {
>> +		if (!desc_is_used(&vq->vq_ring.desc_packed[vq->vq_used_cons_idx],
>> +				  &vq->vq_ring))
>> +			return 0;
>> +		nb_used = VIRTIO_MBUF_BURST_SZ;
>> +	} else {
>> +		nb_used = VIRTQUEUE_NUSED(vq);
>> +	}
>>
>>  	virtio_rmb();
>>
>> @@ -1403,13 +1608,20 @@ virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts(void *rx_queue,
>>  	seg_res = 0;
>>  	hdr_size = hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
>>
>> +
>
>No need to add above empty line.

ok

thanks for the review!

regards,
Jens 
>
>>  	while (i < nb_used) {
>>  		struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *header;
>>
>>  		if (nb_rx == nb_pkts)
>>  			break;
>>
>> -		num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(vq, rcv_pkts, len, 1);
>> +		if (vtpci_packed_queue(vq->hw))
>> +			num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx_packed(vq, rcv_pkts,
>> +				len, 1);
>> +		else
>> +			num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(vq, rcv_pkts, len, 1);
>> +		if (num == 0)
>> +			return nb_rx;
>>  		if (num != 1)
>>  			continue;
>>
>[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-25 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-24 14:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] implement packed virtqueues Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] net/virtio: vring init for packed queues Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:21   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:48     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25 13:51       ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-25 15:12         ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-26  6:01           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/8] net/virtio: add packed virtqueue defines Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:22   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 14:41     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/8] net/virtio: add packed virtqueue helpers Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:23   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 14:40     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/8] net/virtio: dump packed virtqueue data Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:25   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:54     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] net/virtio: implement transmit path for packed queues Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 16:55   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-25 10:59     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:31   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:19     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25 10:46   ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] net/virtio: implement receive " Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:39   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-25 13:54     ` Jens Freimann [this message]
2018-10-26  5:43       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-31 12:46         ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25 10:53   ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 7/8] net/virtio: add virtio send command packed queue support Jens Freimann
2018-10-24 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 8/8] net/virtio: enable packed virtqueues by default Jens Freimann
2018-10-26  6:06   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-11-02  8:58     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-25  9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] implement packed virtqueues Tiwei Bie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181025135416.n3ti672qpmoqthgg@jenstp.localdomain \
    --to=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).