DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, john.mcnamara@intel.com,
	David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc/contrib: patch and code in same file
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:37:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026093741.25267-1-david.hunt@intel.com> (raw)

Add a paragraph to the patch contribution guide suggesting that developers
keep doc updates in the same patch as the code, rather than one big
doc update as the final patch in a patch set.

Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst
index a3d788024..ffeb50436 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst
@@ -169,6 +169,11 @@ Larger changes that require different explanations should be separated into logi
 A good way of thinking about whether a patch should be split is to consider whether the change could be
 applied without dependencies as a backport.
 
+It is better to keep the related documentation changes in the same patch
+file as the code, rather than one big documentation patch at then end of a
+patchset. This makes it easier for future maintenance and development of the
+code.
+
 As a guide to how patches should be structured run ``git log`` on similar files.
 
 
-- 
2.17.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-26  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-26  9:37 David Hunt [this message]
2018-10-26 11:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-11-24 20:48   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181026093741.25267-1-david.hunt@intel.com \
    --to=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).