From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, david.hunt@intel.com
Cc: lei.a.yao@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vm_power: fix app to respect max cpus
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:50:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031115032.12010-1-david.hunt@intel.com> (raw)
The vm_power_manager app was not respecting the POWER_MGR_MAX_CPUS
during initialisation, so if there were more CPUs than this value (64),
it would lead to buffer overruns of there were more then 64 cores in
the system.
Added in a check during init and un-init to only initialise up to
lcore_id 63.
This raises the question as to why not simply increase the value of
POWER_MGR_MAX_CPUS. Well, it's not that simple, as many of the APIs take
a uint64_t as a parameter for the core mask, and this will not work for
cores greater than 63. So some work needs to be done in the future to
remove this limitation. For now we'll fix the memory corruption.
Also, the patch that this fixes says "allow greater than 64 cores" but
that's not across the entire application, it's only for the out-of-band
monitoring. I'll add a notice for an API change in the next release to
clean this up, i.e. depricate any API calls that use masks.
Fixes: 6453b9284b64 ("examples/vm_power: allow greater than 64 cores")
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
---
examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c b/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c
index b7769c3c3..f9e8c0abd 100644
--- a/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c
+++ b/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ power_manager_init(void)
unsigned int i, num_cpus = 0, num_freqs = 0;
int ret = 0;
struct core_info *ci;
+ unsigned int max_core_num;
rte_power_set_env(PM_ENV_ACPI_CPUFREQ);
@@ -105,7 +106,12 @@ power_manager_init(void)
return -1;
}
- for (i = 0; i < ci->core_count; i++) {
+ if (ci->core_count > POWER_MGR_MAX_CPUS)
+ max_core_num = POWER_MGR_MAX_CPUS;
+ else
+ max_core_num = ci->core_count;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_core_num; i++) {
if (ci->cd[i].global_enabled_cpus) {
if (rte_power_init(i) < 0)
RTE_LOG(ERR, POWER_MANAGER,
@@ -165,6 +171,7 @@ power_manager_exit(void)
unsigned int i;
int ret = 0;
struct core_info *ci;
+ unsigned int max_core_num;
ci = get_core_info();
if (!ci) {
@@ -173,7 +180,12 @@ power_manager_exit(void)
return -1;
}
- for (i = 0; i < ci->core_count; i++) {
+ if (ci->core_count > POWER_MGR_MAX_CPUS)
+ max_core_num = POWER_MGR_MAX_CPUS;
+ else
+ max_core_num = ci->core_count;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_core_num; i++) {
if (ci->cd[i].global_enabled_cpus) {
if (rte_power_exit(i) < 0) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, POWER_MANAGER, "Unable to shutdown power manager "
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-31 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-31 11:50 David Hunt [this message]
2018-11-04 20:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181031115032.12010-1-david.hunt@intel.com \
--to=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lei.a.yao@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).