DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
To: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about jumbo frame support on ixgbe
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:38:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201811020139.wA21cx3s022715@ccmail04.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07E6826D@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com>

Hi 

Thanks for your answering to my question.
Please see inline.
> Hi,  Hideyuki Yamashita
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hideyuki Yamashita
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 4:22 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Question about jumbo frame support on ixgbe
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have a very basic question about jumbo frame support for ixgbe.
> > 
> > I understand that some drivers support jumbo frame and if it receive jumbo
> > packet (greater than 1500 byte), it creates mbuf chains and pass it to DPDK
> > application through e.g. rte_eth_rx_burst.
> > 
> > However it looks that ixgbe driver does not support jumbo frame.
> > 
> > Q1. Is my understanding above correct?
> > Q2. If A1 equals YES, then are there any future plan to support jumbo frame
> > on ixgbe?
> 
> Your understanding above correct, but 82599 and x550 has support jumbo frame receive by now!
> In order to use this feature on ixgbe, you need do the following steps:
> 
> 1. you must set dev_conf.rxmode. max_rx_pkt_len to a big number, eg. 9500, when doing port start, for example when start port in API rte_eth_dev_start().
> ixgbe_dev_rx_init() will chose a scatter receive function if the max_rx_pkt_len is larger than the mbuf size, you do not need to set DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER bit in 
> dev_conf.rxmode.offloads, this is the work of PMD driver when it detect jumbo frame is needed to be supported.
Thanks for your info.

> 2. set dev_conf.txmode.offloads bit of  DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS to 1 when doing rte_eth_tx_queue_setup() or , this is very important!! 
> If you not do this, you may only receive JUMBO frame but not forward out. Because as you say,
> the receive packets maybe has a mbuf chains(depending on the size relationship of mbuf size and the max_rx_pkt_len).
> But in ixgbe PMD for setting tx function, it is confusing  in ixgbe_set_tx_function(), you need  to take care of it, it is based on queue offloads bit!
What will happen if DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS is set to 1.
Packets are sent fragmented or re-built as a Jumbo frame and sent to
network?
(My guess is former(packet will be sent fragmented though))

> 3. enable it using CLI "port config mtu <port_id> <value>" if you are using testpmd or using API rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() for your own APP.
> The mtu number is just what you need to update for a large number.
I want to know the relationship between 1,2 and 3.
Do I have to do all 3 steps to send/receive jumbo frame? 
Or, when I relalize jumbo frame support programatically execute 1 and 2,
if I do not modify program and just change setting via CLI then execute
3?

Thanks and BR,
Hideyuki Yamashita
NTT TechnoCross
 
> And all my discussion is based on pf port, if you are using vf, we can have a further discussion.
> Please feel free to contact me if necessary.
> 
> > 
> > BR,
> > Hideyuki Yamashita
> > NTT TechnoCross
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-02  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31 14:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Doc: add known issue for restricted vdev ethdev ops in secondary process Marvin Liu
2018-10-31  8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] Question about jumbo frame support on ixgbe Hideyuki Yamashita
2018-10-31 15:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-01  3:27     ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-11-01  6:55     ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-11-01  3:10   ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-11-02  1:38     ` Hideyuki Yamashita [this message]
2018-11-05  9:47       ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-11-01  3:12   ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-11-22 18:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Doc: add known issue for restricted vdev ethdev ops in secondary process Mcnamara, John
2018-11-23  2:07   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201811020139.wA21cx3s022715@ccmail04.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp \
    --to=yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).