From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8522E81 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:52:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=961; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1541137950; x=1542347550; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=lBRct7OV/lQJ2C+IBWDsNS5kpJ4fYCb6djL9Fxstpdg=; b=CqnEskYUJKfg2lcVrXMGPN4pHrYf0BIXif0bGJJJoFNy7l/40pproLKw 0ZtzOrGr7DmALkuJxLEuQID7+YF3uj0ctsL8oDyauWWMlXtrnXoWzjuk0 I+826BO9sQUmp2CKSMGEtOiHrHHS7g2PdI+Fvv+XIP5F6bszIe0Jyu/Aj g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAADA5dtb/5xdJa1kGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggSBZSiMDowWgg2XK4F6CwEBhGwCgzs?= =?us-ascii?q?iNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtKIU7AQU6PxALGAklDwVJE4UjqBSKGottEQaBQT+EI4I?= =?us-ascii?q?Ghi2CJgKPaI89CZEAI5BXlxUCBAYFAhSBQziBVTMaCBsVgyeCJheOKTAwjU4?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,454,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="194671180" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2018 05:52:10 +0000 Received: from HYONKIM-7R0DR.cisco.com ([10.24.5.113]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wA25q6Ba012874 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 05:52:09 GMT Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 14:52:05 +0900 From: Hyong Youb Kim To: Alejandro Lucero Cc: dev Message-ID: <20181102055204.GA21296@HYONKIM-7R0DR.cisco.com> References: <20181031172931.11894-1-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.24.5.113, [10.24.5.113] X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] fix DMA mask check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 05:52:30 -0000 On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 05:47:40PM +0000, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:29 PM Alejandro Lucero < > alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> wrote: > > > A patchset sent introducing DMA mask checks has several critical > > issues precluding apps to execute. The patchset was reviewed and > > finally accepted after three versions. Obviously it did not go > > through the proper testing what can be explained, at least from my > > side, due to the big changes to the memory initialization code these > > last months. It turns out the patchset did work with legacy memory > > and I'm afraid that was mainly my testing. [...] > > > I have just realized that there is a minor problem with compiling one patch > at a time, but it does compile when all applied. > > I will fix this in another version but I will wait until review and testing > has been reported. This series fixes the deadlock problem in our testbed too. -Hyong