From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729975689 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:39:50 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2018 09:39:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,468,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="278500854" Received: from silpixa00399126.ir.intel.com (HELO silpixa00399126.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.223]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2018 09:39:49 -0800 From: Bruce Richardson To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Bruce Richardson Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:39:13 +0000 Message-Id: <20181105173913.61225-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181105173913.61225-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20181105173913.61225-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/test: improve output for hash read-write test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:39:51 -0000 The hash read-write autotest generates a lot of text, which is very dense on the screen. Even the summary at the end is hard to follow as everything is very compact. We can improve readability by highlighting the starts of the various sections, and by indenting the values within subsections. Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson --- test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c b/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c index 01f986c..6b695ce 100644 --- a/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c +++ b/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c @@ -678,24 +678,26 @@ struct { reader_faster) < 0) return -1; + printf("================\n"); printf("Results summary:\n"); + printf("================\n"); printf("single read: %u\n", htm_results.single_read); printf("single write: %u\n", htm_results.single_write); for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEST; i++) { - printf("core_cnt: %u\n", core_cnt[i]); + printf("+++ core_cnt: %u +++\n", core_cnt[i]); printf("HTM:\n"); - printf("read only: %u\n", htm_results.read_only[i]); - printf("write only: %u\n", htm_results.write_only[i]); - printf("read-write read: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_r[i]); - printf("read-write write: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_w[i]); + printf(" read only: %u\n", htm_results.read_only[i]); + printf(" write only: %u\n", htm_results.write_only[i]); + printf(" read-write read: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_r[i]); + printf(" read-write write: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_w[i]); printf("non HTM:\n"); - printf("read only: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_only[i]); - printf("write only: %u\n", non_htm_results.write_only[i]); - printf("read-write read: %u\n", + printf(" read only: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_only[i]); + printf(" write only: %u\n", non_htm_results.write_only[i]); + printf(" read-write read: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_write_r[i]); - printf("read-write write: %u\n", + printf(" read-write write: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_write_w[i]); } -- 1.8.5.6