From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: bruce.richardson@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
yipeng1.wang@intel.com, dharmik.thakkar@arm.com,
gavin.hu@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] hash: separate lf and rw lock lookup code paths
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:55:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181110185534.5444-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181110185534.5444-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
The lock-free algorithm has caused significant lookup
performance regression for certain use cases. The
regression is attributed to the use of non-relaxed
memory orderings. 2 versions of the lookup functions
are created. One that uses the RW lock and the one that
is lock-free. This restores the performance regression
caused for use cases that used RW lock version of the
lookup function.
Fixes: e605a1d36 ("hash: add lock-free r/w concurrency")
Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Suggested-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
---
lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 290 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index 5ddcccd87..e68bf336b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -1129,9 +1129,38 @@ rte_hash_add_key_data(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, void *data)
return ret;
}
+/* Search one bucket to find the match key - uses rw lock */
+static inline int32_t
+search_one_bucket_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
+ uint16_t sig, void **data,
+ const struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct rte_hash_key *k, *keys = h->key_store;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) {
+ if (bkt->sig_current[i] == sig &&
+ bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) {
+ k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
+ bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+
+ if (rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h) == 0) {
+ if (data != NULL)
+ *data = k->pdata;
+ /*
+ * Return index where key is stored,
+ * subtracting the first dummy index
+ */
+ return bkt->key_idx[i] - 1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+
/* Search one bucket to find the match key */
static inline int32_t
-search_one_bucket(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, uint16_t sig,
+search_one_bucket_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, uint16_t sig,
void **data, const struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt)
{
int i;
@@ -1163,12 +1192,11 @@ search_one_bucket(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, uint16_t sig,
}
static inline int32_t
-__rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
- hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
+__rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
+ hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
{
uint32_t prim_bucket_idx, sec_bucket_idx;
struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, *cur_bkt;
- uint32_t cnt_b, cnt_a;
int ret;
uint16_t short_sig;
@@ -1176,8 +1204,48 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(h, sig);
sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index(h, prim_bucket_idx, short_sig);
+ bkt = &h->buckets[prim_bucket_idx];
+
__hash_rw_reader_lock(h);
+ /* Check if key is in primary location */
+ ret = search_one_bucket_l(h, key, short_sig, data, bkt);
+ if (ret != -1) {
+ __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ /* Calculate secondary hash */
+ bkt = &h->buckets[sec_bucket_idx];
+
+ /* Check if key is in secondary location */
+ FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, bkt) {
+ ret = search_one_bucket_l(h, key, short_sig,
+ data, cur_bkt);
+ if (ret != -1) {
+ __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
+
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+static inline int32_t
+__rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
+ hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
+{
+ uint32_t prim_bucket_idx, sec_bucket_idx;
+ struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, *cur_bkt;
+ uint32_t cnt_b, cnt_a;
+ int ret;
+ uint16_t short_sig;
+
+ short_sig = get_short_sig(sig);
+ prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(h, sig);
+ sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index(h, prim_bucket_idx, short_sig);
+
do {
/* Load the table change counter before the lookup
* starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that
@@ -1188,7 +1256,7 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
/* Check if key is in primary location */
bkt = &h->buckets[prim_bucket_idx];
- ret = search_one_bucket(h, key, short_sig, data, bkt);
+ ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, key, short_sig, data, bkt);
if (ret != -1) {
__hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
return ret;
@@ -1198,7 +1266,7 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
/* Check if key is in secondary location */
FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, bkt) {
- ret = search_one_bucket(h, key, short_sig,
+ ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, key, short_sig,
data, cur_bkt);
if (ret != -1) {
__hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
@@ -1222,11 +1290,19 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
} while (cnt_b != cnt_a);
- __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
-
return -ENOENT;
}
+static inline int32_t
+__rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
+ hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
+{
+ if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support)
+ return __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_lf(h, key, sig, data);
+ else
+ return __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_l(h, key, sig, data);
+}
+
int32_t
rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h,
const void *key, hash_sig_t sig)
@@ -1528,7 +1604,197 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
#define PREFETCH_OFFSET 4
static inline void
-__rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
+__rte_hash_lookup_bulk_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
+ int32_t num_keys, int32_t *positions,
+ uint64_t *hit_mask, void *data[])
+{
+ uint64_t hits = 0;
+ int32_t i;
+ int32_t ret;
+ uint32_t prim_hash[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
+ uint32_t prim_index[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
+ uint32_t sec_index[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
+ uint16_t sig[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
+ const struct rte_hash_bucket *primary_bkt[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
+ const struct rte_hash_bucket *secondary_bkt[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
+ uint32_t prim_hitmask[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
+ uint32_t sec_hitmask[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
+ struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, *next_bkt;
+
+ /* Prefetch first keys */
+ for (i = 0; i < PREFETCH_OFFSET && i < num_keys; i++)
+ rte_prefetch0(keys[i]);
+
+ /*
+ * Prefetch rest of the keys, calculate primary and
+ * secondary bucket and prefetch them
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < (num_keys - PREFETCH_OFFSET); i++) {
+ rte_prefetch0(keys[i + PREFETCH_OFFSET]);
+
+ prim_hash[i] = rte_hash_hash(h, keys[i]);
+
+ sig[i] = get_short_sig(prim_hash[i]);
+ prim_index[i] = get_prim_bucket_index(h, prim_hash[i]);
+ sec_index[i] = get_alt_bucket_index(h, prim_index[i], sig[i]);
+
+ primary_bkt[i] = &h->buckets[prim_index[i]];
+ secondary_bkt[i] = &h->buckets[sec_index[i]];
+
+ rte_prefetch0(primary_bkt[i]);
+ rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]);
+ }
+
+ /* Calculate and prefetch rest of the buckets */
+ for (; i < num_keys; i++) {
+ prim_hash[i] = rte_hash_hash(h, keys[i]);
+
+ sig[i] = get_short_sig(prim_hash[i]);
+ prim_index[i] = get_prim_bucket_index(h, prim_hash[i]);
+ sec_index[i] = get_alt_bucket_index(h, prim_index[i], sig[i]);
+
+ primary_bkt[i] = &h->buckets[prim_index[i]];
+ secondary_bkt[i] = &h->buckets[sec_index[i]];
+
+ rte_prefetch0(primary_bkt[i]);
+ rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]);
+ }
+
+ __hash_rw_reader_lock(h);
+
+ /* Compare signatures and prefetch key slot of first hit */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
+ compare_signatures(&prim_hitmask[i], &sec_hitmask[i],
+ primary_bkt[i], secondary_bkt[i],
+ sig[i], h->sig_cmp_fn);
+
+ if (prim_hitmask[i]) {
+ uint32_t first_hit =
+ __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i])
+ >> 1;
+ uint32_t key_idx =
+ primary_bkt[i]->key_idx[first_hit];
+ const struct rte_hash_key *key_slot =
+ (const struct rte_hash_key *)(
+ (const char *)h->key_store +
+ key_idx * h->key_entry_size);
+ rte_prefetch0(key_slot);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (sec_hitmask[i]) {
+ uint32_t first_hit =
+ __builtin_ctzl(sec_hitmask[i])
+ >> 1;
+ uint32_t key_idx =
+ secondary_bkt[i]->key_idx[first_hit];
+ const struct rte_hash_key *key_slot =
+ (const struct rte_hash_key *)(
+ (const char *)h->key_store +
+ key_idx * h->key_entry_size);
+ rte_prefetch0(key_slot);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
+ positions[i] = -ENOENT;
+ while (prim_hitmask[i]) {
+ uint32_t hit_index =
+ __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i])
+ >> 1;
+ uint32_t key_idx =
+ primary_bkt[i]->key_idx[hit_index];
+ const struct rte_hash_key *key_slot =
+ (const struct rte_hash_key *)(
+ (const char *)h->key_store +
+ key_idx * h->key_entry_size);
+
+ /*
+ * If key index is 0, do not compare key,
+ * as it is checking the dummy slot
+ */
+ if (!!key_idx &
+ !rte_hash_cmp_eq(
+ key_slot->key, keys[i], h)) {
+ if (data != NULL)
+ data[i] = key_slot->pdata;
+
+ hits |= 1ULL << i;
+ positions[i] = key_idx - 1;
+ goto next_key;
+ }
+ prim_hitmask[i] &= ~(3ULL << (hit_index << 1));
+ }
+
+ while (sec_hitmask[i]) {
+ uint32_t hit_index =
+ __builtin_ctzl(sec_hitmask[i])
+ >> 1;
+ uint32_t key_idx =
+ secondary_bkt[i]->key_idx[hit_index];
+ const struct rte_hash_key *key_slot =
+ (const struct rte_hash_key *)(
+ (const char *)h->key_store +
+ key_idx * h->key_entry_size);
+
+ /*
+ * If key index is 0, do not compare key,
+ * as it is checking the dummy slot
+ */
+
+ if (!!key_idx &
+ !rte_hash_cmp_eq(
+ key_slot->key, keys[i], h)) {
+ if (data != NULL)
+ data[i] = key_slot->pdata;
+
+ hits |= 1ULL << i;
+ positions[i] = key_idx - 1;
+ goto next_key;
+ }
+ sec_hitmask[i] &= ~(3ULL << (hit_index << 1));
+ }
+next_key:
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */
+ if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) {
+ if (hit_mask != NULL)
+ *hit_mask = hits;
+ __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* need to check ext buckets for match */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
+ if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0)
+ continue;
+ next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next;
+ FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) {
+ if (data != NULL)
+ ret = search_one_bucket_l(h, keys[i],
+ sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt);
+ else
+ ret = search_one_bucket_l(h, keys[i],
+ sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt);
+ if (ret != -1) {
+ positions[i] = ret;
+ hits |= 1ULL << i;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
+
+ if (hit_mask != NULL)
+ *hit_mask = hits;
+}
+
+static inline void
+__rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
int32_t num_keys, int32_t *positions,
uint64_t *hit_mask, void *data[])
{
@@ -1586,7 +1852,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]);
}
- __hash_rw_reader_lock(h);
do {
/* Load the table change counter before the lookup
* starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that
@@ -1735,10 +2000,10 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next;
FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) {
if (data != NULL)
- ret = search_one_bucket(h, keys[i],
+ ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i],
sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt);
else
- ret = search_one_bucket(h, keys[i],
+ ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i],
sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt);
if (ret != -1) {
positions[i] = ret;
@@ -1748,12 +2013,23 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
}
}
- __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h);
-
if (hit_mask != NULL)
*hit_mask = hits;
}
+static inline void
+__rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
+ int32_t num_keys, int32_t *positions,
+ uint64_t *hit_mask, void *data[])
+{
+ if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support)
+ return __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(h, keys, num_keys,
+ positions, hit_mask, data);
+ else
+ return __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_l(h, keys, num_keys,
+ positions, hit_mask, data);
+}
+
int
rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
uint32_t num_keys, int32_t *positions)
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-10 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-09 16:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-09 16:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] hash: prepare for lock-free and rw-lock separation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-09 16:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] hash: remove rw-lock calls from lock-free functions Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-09 16:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] hash: remove memory orderings from rw-lock lookup fns Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-10 8:51 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-11-10 18:58 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-09 16:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] hash: separate lf and rw lock lookup code paths Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-10 18:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-10 18:55 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2018-11-11 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Jerin Jacob
2018-11-13 16:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-11 21:43 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2018-11-12 4:50 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181110185534.5444-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).