From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA474CC5; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:47:34 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Nov 2018 02:47:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,495,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="105512876" Received: from silpixa00399126.ir.intel.com (HELO silpixa00399126.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.223]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2018 02:47:33 -0800 From: Bruce Richardson To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:47:19 +0000 Message-Id: <20181112104719.62568-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181112104719.62568-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20181105173913.61225-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20181112104719.62568-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/test: improve output for hash read-write test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:47:34 -0000 The hash read-write autotest generates a lot of text, which is very dense on the screen. Even the summary at the end is hard to follow as everything is very compact. We can improve readability by highlighting the starts of the various sections, and by indenting the values within subsections. Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson --- test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c b/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c index 01f986c..6b695ce 100644 --- a/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c +++ b/test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c @@ -678,24 +678,26 @@ struct { reader_faster) < 0) return -1; + printf("================\n"); printf("Results summary:\n"); + printf("================\n"); printf("single read: %u\n", htm_results.single_read); printf("single write: %u\n", htm_results.single_write); for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEST; i++) { - printf("core_cnt: %u\n", core_cnt[i]); + printf("+++ core_cnt: %u +++\n", core_cnt[i]); printf("HTM:\n"); - printf("read only: %u\n", htm_results.read_only[i]); - printf("write only: %u\n", htm_results.write_only[i]); - printf("read-write read: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_r[i]); - printf("read-write write: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_w[i]); + printf(" read only: %u\n", htm_results.read_only[i]); + printf(" write only: %u\n", htm_results.write_only[i]); + printf(" read-write read: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_r[i]); + printf(" read-write write: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_w[i]); printf("non HTM:\n"); - printf("read only: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_only[i]); - printf("write only: %u\n", non_htm_results.write_only[i]); - printf("read-write read: %u\n", + printf(" read only: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_only[i]); + printf(" write only: %u\n", non_htm_results.write_only[i]); + printf(" read-write read: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_write_r[i]); - printf("read-write write: %u\n", + printf(" read-write write: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_write_w[i]); } -- 1.8.5.6