From: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net,
Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>,
qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] dev: don't fail the hotplug request if device is attached in secondary
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:58:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181123145824.95786-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com> (raw)
Consider the following scenario:
1) primary process (A) starts, probes the bus
2) a secondary process (B) starts, probes the bus
3) yet another secondary process (C) starts
4) (C) registers the pci driver and hotplugs the device
* an IPC attach req is sent to the primary (A)
* (A) ignores the -EEXIST from process-local probe
* (A) propagates the request to all secondary processes
* (B) responds with -EEXIST
* (A) replies to the original request with the -EEXIST
return code
* the -EEXIST is returned back to the user, although the
device was successfully attached both locally and in
all other processes
This patch makes the primary process reply with rc=0 even if
there was another secondary process with the device already
attached. The primary process already didn't reply with -EEXIST
when the device was attached locally, so now this behavior is
even more consistent. Looking by the code, this seems to be the
originally intended behavior.
Fixes: ac9e4a17370f ("eal: support attach/detach shared device from secondary")
Cc: qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
index 7c9fcc46c..c0115d5f6 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
@@ -391,13 +391,13 @@ int eal_dev_hotplug_request_to_secondary(struct eal_dev_mp_req *req)
struct eal_dev_mp_req *resp =
(struct eal_dev_mp_req *)mp_reply.msgs[i].param;
if (resp->result != 0) {
- req->result = resp->result;
if (req->t == EAL_DEV_REQ_TYPE_ATTACH &&
- req->result != -EEXIST)
- break;
+ resp->result == -EEXIST)
+ continue;
if (req->t == EAL_DEV_REQ_TYPE_DETACH &&
- req->result != -ENOENT)
- break;
+ resp->result == -ENOENT)
+ continue;
+ req->result = resp->result;
}
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-23 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-23 14:58 Darek Stojaczyk [this message]
2018-11-23 18:30 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-11-25 12:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181123145824.95786-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
--to=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).