From: Kamil Chalupnik <kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: amr.mokhtar@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com,
Kamil Chalupnik <kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] baseband: support bigger Transpor Block
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:07:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207150733.13396-1-kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181207143126.3876-3-kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com>
Test application and Turbo Software driver were adapted
to support chained-mbuf for bigger TB sizes.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Chalupnik <kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com>
---
app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 60 +++++++++---
drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index a25e3a7..5bec70d 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -114,6 +114,17 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
struct test_op_params *op_params);
static inline void
+mbuf_reset(struct rte_mbuf *m)
+{
+ m->pkt_len = 0;
+
+ do {
+ m->data_len = 0;
+ m = m->next;
+ } while (m != NULL);
+}
+
+static inline void
set_avail_op(struct active_device *ad, enum rte_bbdev_op_type op_type)
{
ad->supported_ops |= (1 << op_type);
@@ -573,6 +584,10 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
op_type, n * ref_entries->nb_segments,
mbuf_pool->size);
+ TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(((seg->length + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM) >
+ (uint32_t)UINT16_MAX),
+ "Given data is bigger than allowed mbuf segment size");
+
bufs[i].data = m_head;
bufs[i].offset = 0;
bufs[i].length = 0;
@@ -589,7 +604,6 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
rte_memcpy(data, seg->addr, seg->length);
bufs[i].length += seg->length;
-
for (j = 1; j < ref_entries->nb_segments; ++j) {
struct rte_mbuf *m_tail =
rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mbuf_pool);
@@ -617,6 +631,24 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
"Couldn't chain mbufs from %d data type mbuf pool",
op_type);
}
+
+ } else {
+
+ /* allocate chained-mbuf for output buffer */
+ for (j = 1; j < ref_entries->nb_segments; ++j) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_tail =
+ rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mbuf_pool);
+ TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(m_tail,
+ "Not enough mbufs in %d data type mbuf pool (needed %u, available %u)",
+ op_type,
+ n * ref_entries->nb_segments,
+ mbuf_pool->size);
+
+ ret = rte_pktmbuf_chain(m_head, m_tail);
+ TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret,
+ "Couldn't chain mbufs from %d data type mbuf pool",
+ op_type);
+ }
}
}
@@ -655,7 +687,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
while (m != NULL) {
int8_t *llr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, int8_t *,
input_ops[i].offset);
- for (byte_idx = 0; byte_idx < input_ops[i].length;
+ for (byte_idx = 0; byte_idx < rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m);
++byte_idx)
llr[byte_idx] = round((double)max_llr_modulus *
llr[byte_idx] / INT8_MAX);
@@ -864,15 +896,18 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
uint8_t i;
struct rte_mbuf *m = op->data;
uint8_t nb_dst_segments = orig_op->nb_segments;
+ uint32_t total_data_size = 0;
TEST_ASSERT(nb_dst_segments == m->nb_segs,
"Number of segments differ in original (%u) and filled (%u) op",
nb_dst_segments, m->nb_segs);
+ /* Validate each mbuf segment length */
for (i = 0; i < nb_dst_segments; ++i) {
/* Apply offset to the first mbuf segment */
uint16_t offset = (i == 0) ? op->offset : 0;
- uint16_t data_len = m->data_len - offset;
+ uint16_t data_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m) - offset;
+ total_data_size += orig_op->segments[i].length;
TEST_ASSERT(orig_op->segments[i].length == data_len,
"Length of segment differ in original (%u) and filled (%u) op",
@@ -884,6 +919,12 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
m = m->next;
}
+ /* Validate total mbuf pkt length */
+ uint32_t pkt_len = rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(op->data) - op->offset;
+ TEST_ASSERT(total_data_size == pkt_len,
+ "Length of data differ in original (%u) and filled (%u) op",
+ total_data_size, pkt_len);
+
return TEST_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -1427,10 +1468,8 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
for (i = 0; i < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++i) {
- for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j) {
- struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op = ops_enq[j];
- rte_pktmbuf_reset(op->turbo_dec.hard_output.data);
- }
+ for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j)
+ mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->turbo_dec.hard_output.data);
start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
@@ -1529,8 +1568,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE)
for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j)
- rte_pktmbuf_reset(
- ops_enq[j]->turbo_enc.output.data);
+ mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->turbo_enc.output.data);
start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
@@ -2025,7 +2063,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
time_st->enq_acc_total_time += stats.acc_offload_cycles;
/* ensure enqueue has been completed */
- rte_delay_ms(10);
+ rte_delay_us(200);
/* Start time meas for dequeue function offload latency */
deq_start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
@@ -2106,7 +2144,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
time_st->enq_acc_total_time += stats.acc_offload_cycles;
/* ensure enqueue has been completed */
- rte_delay_ms(10);
+ rte_delay_us(200);
/* Start time meas for dequeue function offload latency */
deq_start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c b/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
index 57f6ba1..19fbb55 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
@@ -83,6 +83,18 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
enum rte_bbdev_op_type type;
} __rte_cache_aligned;
+static inline char *
+mbuf_append(struct rte_mbuf *m_head, struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t len)
+{
+ if (unlikely(len > rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m)))
+ return NULL;
+
+ char *tail = (char *)m->buf_addr + m->data_off + m->data_len;
+ m->data_len = (uint16_t)(m->data_len + len);
+ m_head->pkt_len = (m_head->pkt_len + len);
+ return tail;
+}
+
/* Calculate index based on Table 5.1.3-3 from TS34.212 */
static inline int32_t
compute_idx(uint16_t k)
@@ -437,7 +449,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
return -1;
}
- if (in_length - kw < 0) {
+ if (in_length < kw) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
"Mismatch between input length (%u) and kw (%u)",
in_length, kw);
@@ -456,9 +468,9 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
static inline void
process_enc_cb(struct turbo_sw_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
uint8_t r, uint8_t c, uint16_t k, uint16_t ncb,
- uint32_t e, struct rte_mbuf *m_in, struct rte_mbuf *m_out,
- uint16_t in_offset, uint16_t out_offset, uint16_t total_left,
- struct rte_bbdev_stats *q_stats)
+ uint32_t e, struct rte_mbuf *m_in, struct rte_mbuf *m_out_head,
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_out, uint16_t in_offset, uint16_t out_offset,
+ uint16_t in_length, struct rte_bbdev_stats *q_stats)
{
int ret;
int16_t k_idx;
@@ -484,7 +496,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
/* CRC24A (for TB) */
if ((enc->op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_CRC_24A_ATTACH) &&
(enc->code_block_mode == 1)) {
- ret = is_enc_input_valid(k - 24, k_idx, total_left);
+ ret = is_enc_input_valid(k - 24, k_idx, in_length);
if (ret != 0) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
return;
@@ -494,7 +506,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
/* Check if there is a room for CRC bits if not use
* the temporary buffer.
*/
- if (rte_pktmbuf_append(m_in, 3) == NULL) {
+ if (mbuf_append(m_in, m_in, 3) == NULL) {
rte_memcpy(q->enc_in, in, (k - 24) >> 3);
in = q->enc_in;
} else {
@@ -517,7 +529,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
#endif
} else if (enc->op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_CRC_24B_ATTACH) {
/* CRC24B */
- ret = is_enc_input_valid(k - 24, k_idx, total_left);
+ ret = is_enc_input_valid(k - 24, k_idx, in_length);
if (ret != 0) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
return;
@@ -527,7 +539,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
/* Check if there is a room for CRC bits if this is the last
* CB in TB. If not use temporary buffer.
*/
- if ((c - r == 1) && (rte_pktmbuf_append(m_in, 3) == NULL)) {
+ if ((c - r == 1) && (mbuf_append(m_in, m_in, 3) == NULL)) {
rte_memcpy(q->enc_in, in, (k - 24) >> 3);
in = q->enc_in;
} else if (c - r > 1) {
@@ -549,7 +561,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
q_stats->acc_offload_cycles += rte_rdtsc_precise() - start_time;
#endif
} else {
- ret = is_enc_input_valid(k, k_idx, total_left);
+ ret = is_enc_input_valid(k, k_idx, in_length);
if (ret != 0) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
return;
@@ -570,7 +582,8 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
out1 = RTE_PTR_ADD(out0, (k >> 3) + 1);
out2 = RTE_PTR_ADD(out1, (k >> 3) + 1);
} else {
- out0 = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_append(m_out, (k >> 3) * 3 + 2);
+ out0 = (uint8_t *)mbuf_append(m_out_head, m_out,
+ (k >> 3) * 3 + 2);
if (out0 == NULL) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
@@ -623,7 +636,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
const uint8_t mask_out[] = {0xFF, 0xC0, 0xF0, 0xFC};
/* get output data starting address */
- rm_out = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_append(m_out, out_len);
+ rm_out = (uint8_t *)mbuf_append(m_out_head, m_out, out_len);
if (rm_out == NULL) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
@@ -725,14 +738,16 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
uint16_t out_offset = enc->output.offset;
struct rte_mbuf *m_in = enc->input.data;
struct rte_mbuf *m_out = enc->output.data;
- uint16_t total_left = enc->input.length;
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_out_head = enc->output.data;
+ uint32_t in_length, mbuf_total_left = enc->input.length;
+ uint16_t seg_total_left;
/* Clear op status */
op->status = 0;
- if (total_left > RTE_BBDEV_MAX_TB_SIZE >> 3) {
+ if (mbuf_total_left > RTE_BBDEV_MAX_TB_SIZE >> 3) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "TB size (%u) is too big, max: %d",
- total_left, RTE_BBDEV_MAX_TB_SIZE);
+ mbuf_total_left, RTE_BBDEV_MAX_TB_SIZE);
op->status = 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
return;
}
@@ -755,7 +770,10 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
r = 0;
}
- while (total_left > 0 && r < c) {
+ while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
+
+ seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m_in) - in_offset;
+
if (enc->code_block_mode == 0) {
k = (r < enc->tb_params.c_neg) ?
enc->tb_params.k_neg : enc->tb_params.k_pos;
@@ -769,22 +787,32 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
e = enc->cb_params.e;
}
- process_enc_cb(q, op, r, c, k, ncb, e, m_in,
- m_out, in_offset, out_offset, total_left,
+ process_enc_cb(q, op, r, c, k, ncb, e, m_in, m_out_head,
+ m_out, in_offset, out_offset, seg_total_left,
queue_stats);
/* Update total_left */
- total_left -= (k - crc24_bits) >> 3;
+ in_length = ((k - crc24_bits) >> 3);
+ mbuf_total_left -= in_length;
/* Update offsets for next CBs (if exist) */
in_offset += (k - crc24_bits) >> 3;
if (enc->op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_RATE_MATCH)
out_offset += e >> 3;
else
out_offset += (k >> 3) * 3 + 2;
+
+ /* Update offsets */
+ if (seg_total_left == in_length) {
+ /* Go to the next mbuf */
+ m_in = m_in->next;
+ m_out = m_out->next;
+ in_offset = 0;
+ out_offset = 0;
+ }
r++;
}
/* check if all input data was processed */
- if (total_left != 0) {
+ if (mbuf_total_left != 0) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
"Mismatch between mbuf length and included CBs sizes");
@@ -903,8 +931,9 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
static inline void
process_dec_cb(struct turbo_sw_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
uint8_t c, uint16_t k, uint16_t kw, struct rte_mbuf *m_in,
- struct rte_mbuf *m_out, uint16_t in_offset, uint16_t out_offset,
- bool check_crc_24b, uint16_t crc24_overlap, uint16_t total_left,
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_out_head, struct rte_mbuf *m_out,
+ uint16_t in_offset, uint16_t out_offset, bool check_crc_24b,
+ uint16_t crc24_overlap, uint16_t in_length,
struct rte_bbdev_stats *q_stats)
{
int ret;
@@ -925,7 +954,7 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
k_idx = compute_idx(k);
- ret = is_dec_input_valid(k_idx, kw, total_left);
+ ret = is_dec_input_valid(k_idx, kw, in_length);
if (ret != 0) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
return;
@@ -983,7 +1012,8 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
q_stats->acc_offload_cycles += rte_rdtsc_precise() - start_time;
#endif
- out = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_append(m_out, ((k - crc24_overlap) >> 3));
+ out = (uint8_t *)mbuf_append(m_out_head, m_out,
+ ((k - crc24_overlap) >> 3));
if (out == NULL) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Too little space in output mbuf");
@@ -1038,9 +1068,11 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *dec = &op->turbo_dec;
struct rte_mbuf *m_in = dec->input.data;
struct rte_mbuf *m_out = dec->hard_output.data;
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_out_head = dec->hard_output.data;
uint16_t in_offset = dec->input.offset;
- uint16_t total_left = dec->input.length;
uint16_t out_offset = dec->hard_output.offset;
+ uint32_t mbuf_total_left = dec->input.length;
+ uint16_t seg_total_left;
/* Clear op status */
op->status = 0;
@@ -1062,11 +1094,13 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_DEC_TB_CRC_24B_KEEP))
crc24_overlap = 24;
- while (total_left > 0) {
+ while (mbuf_total_left > 0) {
if (dec->code_block_mode == 0)
k = (r < dec->tb_params.c_neg) ?
dec->tb_params.k_neg : dec->tb_params.k_pos;
+ seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m_in) - in_offset;
+
/* Calculates circular buffer size (Kw).
* According to 3gpp 36.212 section 5.1.4.2
* Kw = 3 * Kpi,
@@ -1079,23 +1113,32 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
*/
kw = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(k + 4, RTE_BBDEV_C_SUBBLOCK) * 3;
- process_dec_cb(q, op, c, k, kw, m_in, m_out, in_offset,
- out_offset, check_bit(dec->op_flags,
+ process_dec_cb(q, op, c, k, kw, m_in, m_out_head, m_out,
+ in_offset, out_offset, check_bit(dec->op_flags,
RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_CRC_TYPE_24B), crc24_overlap,
- total_left, queue_stats);
+ seg_total_left, queue_stats);
/* To keep CRC24 attached to end of Code block, use
* RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_DEC_TB_CRC_24B_KEEP flag as it
* removed by default once verified.
*/
- /* Update total_left */
- total_left -= kw;
- /* Update offsets for next CBs (if exist) */
- in_offset += kw;
- out_offset += ((k - crc24_overlap) >> 3);
+ mbuf_total_left -= kw;
+
+ /* Update offsets */
+ if (seg_total_left == kw) {
+ /* Go to the next mbuf */
+ m_in = m_in->next;
+ m_out = m_out->next;
+ in_offset = 0;
+ out_offset = 0;
+ } else {
+ /* Update offsets for next CBs (if exist) */
+ in_offset += kw;
+ out_offset += ((k - crc24_overlap) >> 3);
+ }
r++;
}
- if (total_left != 0) {
+ if (mbuf_total_left != 0) {
op->status |= 1 << RTE_BBDEV_DATA_ERROR;
rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
"Mismatch between mbuf length and included Circular buffer sizes");
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-07 14:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-07 15:07 ` Kamil Chalupnik [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-07 14:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] baseband: enhancement of offload cost test Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-07 14:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] baseband: enhancement of throughput test Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-07 14:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] baseband: enhancement of interrupt test Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] baseband: enhancement of offload cost test Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] baseband: enhancement of throughput test Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-13 20:09 ` Mokhtar, Amr
2018-12-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] baseband: support bigger Transpor Block Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-13 20:09 ` Mokhtar, Amr
2018-12-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] baseband: enhancement of interrupt test Kamil Chalupnik
2018-12-13 20:10 ` Mokhtar, Amr
2018-12-13 20:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] baseband: enhancement of offload cost test Mokhtar, Amr
2018-12-18 10:25 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181207150733.13396-1-kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com \
--to=kamilx.chalupnik@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=amr.mokhtar@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).