From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6B31B943;
 Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:36:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-405a-a193-cb97-58ba-1c15.dyn6.twc.com
 ([2606:a000:111b:405a:a193:cb97:58ba:1c15] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1gXmhL-0002XQ-3y; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:36:21 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:35:38 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
 "tredaelli@redhat.com" <tredaelli@redhat.com>,
 "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 "amr.mokhtar@intel.com" <amr.mokhtar@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20181214123538.GA28669@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
References: <1543957065-20990-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <a12c2d1a-c50f-1c46-8c3a-05de781a934d@nxp.com>
 <CAJFAV8z8TRkagOg5FzxYjD9WP=wDa8XbyjcGzHXdKvr5GJrLeA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8z8TRkagOg5FzxYjD9WP=wDa8XbyjcGzHXdKvr5GJrLeA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bbdev: add missing experimental tags
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:36:29 -0000

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:00:17AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:54 AM Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I can see that there are other APIs as well which are not marked as
> > experimental like rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk
> > rte_bbdev_dec_op_free_bulk, rte_bbdev_enqueue_enc_ops etc.
> >
> 
> Well, that's the problem with inlines...
> I don't think we can detect these easily.
> 
We can, if the symbols get added to the version map as they should.  But (as you
note), because these functions are inlines, theres no error thrown for not
following that rule.

> 
> -- 
> David Marchand