From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com (mail-pl1-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD701B561 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 08:30:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id g9so4405234plo.3 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 23:30:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9X9Ksj8vovXy8svKKnc7YZhkIwfd8wpG88DXaeyHnUk=; b=wRqM55mLdAY06edKH5G9TMvYF47JS/iBjCXP6tMGWHrSBNm//Zrq1SVqyXkEfhDQU9 GrSBLtrfOnlbBQDFjwuctZxV7POYt8uclxLgfFTE6Cu+o8U5hW2hkiP1EhKqFnZbMnjh o0LcSuA47y9ETFvrH/qkzKsZfm+DIYBdgSoLnrjajPbxvglZDVPpbC0yE3+s7yhJQvNq cOjVoCp5+XHX1wbui5ggDVZaHzRqwT0wHJSccHJOl1abdFj+6x+yW+573HmVMHMAmu+Z foqOxZE6N9xKsmyrfnO+eHglJ+Zo2/tDE3hwBtr8zEU1e1MqV7nCkKqPHYHFNKb576HR n8cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9X9Ksj8vovXy8svKKnc7YZhkIwfd8wpG88DXaeyHnUk=; b=gZtrqyvu8pom0uQvgHkI811b8/crfXdWKLN8gYLa4b0KTQ6sJ0pw3o1eavpSpdGjxv MuNDFvTs/Us7VOD6G5l6vHauQNCjAQAokm91v41qtxzdCZSs3BrGR7oWo+SabGWHsOO9 1sCmhoydS13J9Tm2HwPXRFLmBkGVX1S9g4kqSahWrsFME+G3zu+AWXcyHIM43n7Q90wC f6DzX8p2JG0tzbVGk1O7Os0mlj7j15J3SL0ob0JQMnVaoBXcsYCsLveShCJZyc3VQ2yU +4S7Ivaf0no0fL6hVvzDXJv6cPCqZmrWvBt2QwxsRyei3fQVPLxuCIUQLKNKe29CJ2WR wcvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcPyxPubTx+hH7CJavjvTgFitKlyubJb56kLcEUIn8rPVAMZhtz ged+NzhxphGf9Dg2L0QgVU9m/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN68Ry57X67j6zsc5iOpyYhwl9nC2fS9qD0zhGqJEBUVnoiwtuzmAJ+ul9/biPmho1i9VRMAgA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d68c:: with SMTP id v12mr8822559ply.4.1545550258355; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 23:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 125sm34800961pfg.39.2018.12.22.23.30.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 Dec 2018 23:30:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 23:30:51 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, paulmck@linux.ibm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, dharmik.thakkar@arm.com, nd@arm.com, Malvika Gupta Message-ID: <20181222233051.0a930102@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20181222021420.5114-3-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> References: <20181122033055.3431-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222021420.5114-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222021420.5114-3-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 07:30:59 -0000 On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 20:14:20 -0600 Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > From: Dharmik Thakkar > > Add API positive/negative test cases and functional tests. > > Signed-off-by: Malvika Gupta > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu Just a thought, could you build stress tests like the kernel RCU tests? One worry is that RCU does not play well with blocking threads (and sometimes preemption).