From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65483A04B6; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:12:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACE437AF; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:12:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C26DA3 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:12:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E427522607; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:12:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:12:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=YDgetQlnSrjyTK1m5mna93cDU+vipIx1ut7+soea8oQ=; b=nAKgkGzomcvI 3g4lwSekr93QcNlnog8MS99F9Wu2twsftKONdr8wIs1MqzEZQmhqBbTBb75VPjI5 7+tmCdC0qyxOzs/epprHlzx3gZIoSgEMUSoKBJWf5hkkWJIcf1VgByJHClwZbUkt /xWZy5uCj45l34gHqZDr+UbtySaTqBk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=YDgetQlnSrjyTK1m5mna93cDU+vipIx1ut7+soea8 oQ=; b=vD9xGAXdK4MW1yAYfcYI8iHHebvws7zJ4kSQlPvVM88RIY58Fl8czzR0R bLkOiwefSphPd15VXuZN0uWz11xyfGkaJL4bPKQ8oOzyCClFJX9rLkcvXillnO/l 2pDOIbC353aA2bp7wsU5RSgcbXrHXHC6d80DfTZqkgyv22GX7M+Nt9E8X0N40aBI gcGTWVoo/j3j+iuSCw7Jx9wrZXeT4/TXBKLLvKyn+39bZ4OYc/wnFDa4g49yq3XE C60n/mjXDhdjH72MrH4AwvQHzxBIRL56Us+UaqcVjfC3vVhjwVeIhjh1yOLeVeaK 2JAeEwr92gJ0v1toLzsdXTZFpY7pA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudehkedgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ffohhmrghinhepshhhsgdrtghipdguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddv tdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BAF1480062; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:12:24 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev , Aaron Conole , Michael Santana Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:12:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20188215.cEB1Wkdlas@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20191122155429.18971-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <4177024.uonCvJI2tQ@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: add minimal check on testpmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 24/11/2019 15:17, David Marchand: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:29 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 22/11/2019 16:54, David Marchand: > > > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh > > > +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh > > > +if [ "$AARCH64" != "1" ]; then > > > + ./devtools/test-null.sh > > > > You are missing the build directory as first parameter, > > otherwise it won't find testpmd. > > This parameter is optional. > In test-null.sh: > build=${1:-build} # first argument can be the build directory > > travis builds in this directory. Oh right. It's funny, because I wrote it and forgot :) > I suppose you noticed that the jobs in travis were all failing, but > this is because the fix [1] on testpmd is not in master yet. > 1: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/63226/ I will pull next-net soon. > > One nit: ./ is probably useless. > > No strong opinion.