From: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com
Cc: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/ipsec: fix test initialisation
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:14:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553084044-21373-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190320121404.GfxrON-kNshpStgldlcUH_w4uosjXQ4i9Sztp3_h7Rc@z> (raw)
Fix xform initialisation.
Fix testsuite_setup.
Loop on rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst().
Remove unused variables.
Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_ipsec.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 80a2d25..7e3fc97 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
#define BURST_SIZE 32
#define REORDER_PKTS 1
+#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 100
struct user_params {
enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
@@ -79,7 +80,6 @@ struct ipsec_unitest_params {
struct rte_mbuf *obuf[BURST_SIZE], *ibuf[BURST_SIZE],
*testbuf[BURST_SIZE];
- uint8_t *digest;
uint16_t pkt_index;
};
@@ -111,8 +111,6 @@ static struct ipsec_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
static struct ipsec_unitest_params unittest_params;
static struct user_params uparams;
-static uint8_t global_key[128] = { 0 };
-
struct supported_cipher_algo {
const char *keyword;
enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm algo;
@@ -215,30 +213,26 @@ fill_crypto_xform(struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params,
const struct supported_auth_algo *auth_algo,
const struct supported_cipher_algo *cipher_algo)
{
- ut_params->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
- ut_params->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
- ut_params->auth_xform.auth.key.data = global_key;
- ut_params->auth_xform.auth.key.length = auth_algo->key_len;
- ut_params->auth_xform.auth.digest_length = auth_algo->digest_len;
- ut_params->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
-
ut_params->cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.algo = cipher_algo->algo;
- ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.key.data = global_key;
- ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.key.length = cipher_algo->key_len;
- ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.op = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
- ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
- ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = cipher_algo->iv_len;
+ ut_params->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+ ut_params->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
if (ut_params->ipsec_xform.direction ==
RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
- ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->auth_xform;
- ut_params->auth_xform.next = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
+ ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
+ ut_params->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
ut_params->cipher_xform.next = NULL;
+ ut_params->auth_xform.next = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
+ ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->auth_xform;
} else {
- ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
- ut_params->cipher_xform.next = &ut_params->auth_xform;
+ ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ ut_params->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
ut_params->auth_xform.next = NULL;
+ ut_params->cipher_xform.next = &ut_params->auth_xform;
+ ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
}
}
@@ -287,9 +281,12 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
int rc;
memset(ts_params, 0, sizeof(*ts_params));
+ memset(ut_params, 0, sizeof(*ut_params));
+ memset(&uparams, 0, sizeof(struct user_params));
uparams.auth = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
uparams.cipher = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+ uparams.aead = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_NOT_SPECIFIED;
strcpy(uparams.auth_algo, "null");
strcpy(uparams.cipher_algo, "null");
@@ -759,6 +756,7 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
uint32_t k, ng;
struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
+ int i = 0;
/* call crypto prepare */
k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
@@ -774,8 +772,12 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
return TEST_FAILED;
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
+ while ((k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
+ ut_params->cop, num_pkts)) == 0 && i < DEQUEUE_COUNT) {
+ rte_pause();
+ i++;
+ }
+
if (k != num_pkts) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
return TEST_FAILED;
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 12:14 Bernard Iremonger [this message]
2019-03-20 12:14 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-22 13:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-22 13:47 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-22 14:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-03-22 14:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-04 13:54 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-04 13:54 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-04 14:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test/ipsec: " Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-04 14:51 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-05 11:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-05 11:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-16 14:58 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-16 14:58 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553084044-21373-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).