* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
@ 2019-03-20 13:11 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:11 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) @ 2019-03-20 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
Hi：
When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array subscript to cross the boundary.
According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhaohui8 <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
}
-static uint8_t
+static uint16_t
max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
{
if (n <= 0)
@@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
* @param port_pos Port to assign.
*/
static void
-selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
+selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
{
struct port *agg, *port;
uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
uint16_t *slaves;
- uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
- uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
uint16_t default_slave = 0;
- uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
+ uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
struct rte_eth_link link_info;
slaves = internals->active_slaves;
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
struct ether_addr slave_addr;
struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
- uint8_t i, slave_id;
+ uint16_t i, slave_id;
/* Update link status on each port */
--
1.9.5.msysgit.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
@ 2019-03-20 13:11 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) @ 2019-03-20 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 2060 bytes --]
Hi£º
When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array subscript to cross the boundary.
According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhaohui8 <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic¡®s lsc event for mode 4
Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
}
-static uint8_t
+static uint16_t
max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
{
if (n <= 0)
@@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
* @param port_pos Port to assign.
*/
static void
-selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
+selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
{
struct port *agg, *port;
uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
uint16_t *slaves;
- uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
- uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
uint16_t default_slave = 0;
- uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
+ uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
struct rte_eth_link link_info;
slaves = internals->active_slaves;
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
struct ether_addr slave_addr;
struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
- uint8_t i, slave_id;
+ uint16_t i, slave_id;
/* Update link status on each port */
--
1.9.5.msysgit.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:11 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
@ 2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-03-20 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
Cc: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit, chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:26 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <
zhaohui8@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi：
> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause
> the array subscript to cross the boundary.
> According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to
> RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
>
> From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: zhaohui8 <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s
> lsc event for mode 4
>
> Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
> SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
> }
> -static uint8_t
> +static uint16_t
> max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
> {
> if (n <= 0)
> @@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
> * @param port_pos Port to assign.
> */
> static void
> -selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
> +selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
> {
> struct port *agg, *port;
> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
> uint16_t *slaves;
> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
> - uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> + uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
> slaves = internals->active_slaves;
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
> struct ether_addr slave_addr;
> struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
> - uint8_t i, slave_id;
> + uint16_t i, slave_id;
>
> /* Update link status on each port */
> --
> 1.9.5.msysgit.0
>
>
Oh, I had missed this [8] array, good catch.
For the slave id on 16bits, I sent this earlier:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/51387/
And I have other fixes for 802.3ad that I will send once properly tested.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
@ 2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-03-20 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
Cc: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit, chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:26 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <
zhaohui8@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi：
> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause
> the array subscript to cross the boundary.
> According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to
> RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
>
> From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: zhaohui8 <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s
> lsc event for mode 4
>
> Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
> SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
> }
> -static uint8_t
> +static uint16_t
> max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
> {
> if (n <= 0)
> @@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
> * @param port_pos Port to assign.
> */
> static void
> -selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
> +selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
> {
> struct port *agg, *port;
> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
> uint16_t *slaves;
> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
> - uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> + uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
> slaves = internals->active_slaves;
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
> struct ether_addr slave_addr;
> struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
> - uint8_t i, slave_id;
> + uint16_t i, slave_id;
>
> /* Update link status on each port */
> --
> 1.9.5.msysgit.0
>
>
Oh, I had missed this [8] array, good catch.
For the slave id on 16bits, I sent this earlier:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/51387/
And I have other fixes for 802.3ad that I will send once properly tested.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] 答复: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
@ 2019-03-20 13:54 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:54 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) @ 2019-03-20 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand
Cc: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit, chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
Well done, Can you fix it?
thanks
by zhaohui
发件人: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2019年3月20日 21:39
收件人: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; chenchanghu <chenchanghu@huawei.com>; stable@dpdk.org; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
主题: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:26 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <zhaohui8@huawei.com<mailto:zhaohui8@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi：
When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array subscript to cross the boundary.
According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhaohui8 <zhaohui8@huawei.com<mailto:zhaohui8@huawei.com>>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
}
-static uint8_t
+static uint16_t
max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
{
if (n <= 0)
@@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
* @param port_pos Port to assign.
*/
static void
-selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
+selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
{
struct port *agg, *port;
uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
uint16_t *slaves;
- uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
- uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
uint16_t default_slave = 0;
- uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
+ uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
struct rte_eth_link link_info;
slaves = internals->active_slaves;
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
struct ether_addr slave_addr;
struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
- uint8_t i, slave_id;
+ uint16_t i, slave_id;
/* Update link status on each port */
--
1.9.5.msysgit.0
Oh, I had missed this [8] array, good catch.
For the slave id on 16bits, I sent this earlier:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/51387/
And I have other fixes for 802.3ad that I will send once properly tested.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] 答复: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
@ 2019-03-20 13:54 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) @ 2019-03-20 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand
Cc: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit, chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
Well done, Can you fix it?
thanks
by zhaohui
发件人: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2019年3月20日 21:39
收件人: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; chenchanghu <chenchanghu@huawei.com>; stable@dpdk.org; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
主题: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:26 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <zhaohui8@huawei.com<mailto:zhaohui8@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi：
When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array subscript to cross the boundary.
According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhaohui8 <zhaohui8@huawei.com<mailto:zhaohui8@huawei.com>>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
}
-static uint8_t
+static uint16_t
max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
{
if (n <= 0)
@@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
* @param port_pos Port to assign.
*/
static void
-selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
+selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
{
struct port *agg, *port;
uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
uint16_t *slaves;
- uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
- uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
uint16_t default_slave = 0;
- uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
+ uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
struct rte_eth_link link_info;
slaves = internals->active_slaves;
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
struct ether_addr slave_addr;
struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
- uint8_t i, slave_id;
+ uint16_t i, slave_id;
/* Update link status on each port */
--
1.9.5.msysgit.0
Oh, I had missed this [8] array, good catch.
For the slave id on 16bits, I sent this earlier:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/51387/
And I have other fixes for 802.3ad that I will send once properly tested.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:54 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
@ 2019-03-20 14:21 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 14:21 ` David Marchand
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-03-20 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
Cc: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit, chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
Hello Zhaohui,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:54 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <
zhaohui8@huawei.com> wrote:
> Well done, Can you fix it?
>
> thanks
>
> by zhaohui
>
I can take it as part of my series yes.
I will keep your SoB on this part.
Is your name okay like this ?
Zhaohui Polestar <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
--
David Marchand
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-20 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
@ 2019-03-20 14:21 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-03-20 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
Cc: dev, Chas Williams, Ferruh Yigit, chenchanghu, stable, wangyunjian
Hello Zhaohui,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:54 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <
zhaohui8@huawei.com> wrote:
> Well done, Can you fix it?
>
> thanks
>
> by zhaohui
>
I can take it as part of my series yes.
I will keep your SoB on this part.
Is your name okay like this ?
Zhaohui Polestar <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
--
David Marchand
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chas Williams @ 2019-03-19 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar), dev
Cc: chenchanghu, wangyunjian, stable, Mrzyglod, Daniel T,
Declan Doherty, Nicolau, Radu
On 3/19/19 1:37 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 3/6/2019 3:42 AM, Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) wrote:
>> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array
>> subscript to cross the boundary.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> index f6f8b28..b5589c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> @@ -920,8 +920,8 @@ static void selection_logic (struct bond_dev_private
>> *internals, uint8_t slave_id
>> struct port *agg, *port;
>> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
>> uint16_t *slaves;
>> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
>> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
>> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
>> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
>
> Patch doesn't apply clearly but I think the intention in the fix is clear.
Zhaohui,
Has this been an actual problem in practice? I ask because the number
of possible slaves for the bonding drivers appears to be RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS.
I suspect people typically have far fewer slaves on a bonding device in
practice.
> Is there any specific reason to pick the number '8'?
I suspect someone guessed this was the maximum reasonable number of
slaves.
> Also this function gets 'uint8_t slave_id' as argument, if this is port_is,
> should it be uint16_t?
It probably was never completely changed when the DPDK port id changed
from uint8 to uint16.
>
>> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
>> uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
>> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
>> --
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
@ 2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chas Williams @ 2019-03-19 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar), dev
Cc: chenchanghu, wangyunjian, stable, Mrzyglod, Daniel T,
Declan Doherty, Nicolau, Radu
On 3/19/19 1:37 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 3/6/2019 3:42 AM, Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) wrote:
>> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array
>> subscript to cross the boundary.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> index f6f8b28..b5589c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>> @@ -920,8 +920,8 @@ static void selection_logic (struct bond_dev_private
>> *internals, uint8_t slave_id
>> struct port *agg, *port;
>> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
>> uint16_t *slaves;
>> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
>> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
>> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
>> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
>
> Patch doesn't apply clearly but I think the intention in the fix is clear.
Zhaohui,
Has this been an actual problem in practice? I ask because the number
of possible slaves for the bonding drivers appears to be RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS.
I suspect people typically have far fewer slaves on a bonding device in
practice.
> Is there any specific reason to pick the number '8'?
I suspect someone guessed this was the maximum reasonable number of
slaves.
> Also this function gets 'uint8_t slave_id' as argument, if this is port_is,
> should it be uint16_t?
It probably was never completely changed when the DPDK port id changed
from uint8 to uint16.
>
>> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
>> uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
>> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
>> --
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-06 3:42 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
@ 2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-03-19 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar), dev, Chas Williams
Cc: chenchanghu, wangyunjian, stable, Mrzyglod, Daniel T,
Declan Doherty, Nicolau, Radu
On 3/6/2019 3:42 AM, Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) wrote:
> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array
> subscript to cross the boundary.
>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index f6f8b28..b5589c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -920,8 +920,8 @@ static void selection_logic (struct bond_dev_private
> *internals, uint8_t slave_id
> struct port *agg, *port;
> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
> uint16_t *slaves;
> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
Patch doesn't apply clearly but I think the intention in the fix is clear.
Is there any specific reason to pick the number '8'?
Also this function gets 'uint8_t slave_id' as argument, if this is port_is,
should it be uint16_t?
> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
> uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-03-19 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar), dev, Chas Williams
Cc: chenchanghu, wangyunjian, stable, Mrzyglod, Daniel T,
Declan Doherty, Nicolau, Radu
On 3/6/2019 3:42 AM, Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) wrote:
> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array
> subscript to cross the boundary.
>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index f6f8b28..b5589c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -920,8 +920,8 @@ static void selection_logic (struct bond_dev_private
> *internals, uint8_t slave_id
> struct port *agg, *port;
> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
> uint16_t *slaves;
> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
Patch doesn't apply clearly but I think the intention in the fix is clear.
Is there any specific reason to pick the number '8'?
Also this function gets 'uint8_t slave_id' as argument, if this is port_is,
should it be uint16_t?
> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
> uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4
@ 2019-03-06 3:42 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) @ 2019-03-06 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, Chas Williams, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: chenchanghu, wangyunjian, stable
When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause the array subscript to cross the boundary.
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index f6f8b28..b5589c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -920,8 +920,8 @@ static void selection_logic (struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id
struct port *agg, *port;
uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
uint16_t *slaves;
- uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
- uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
+ uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
uint16_t default_slave = 0;
uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
struct rte_eth_link link_info;
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-21 9:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-20 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s lsc event for mode 4 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:11 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 13:39 ` David Marchand
2019-03-20 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 13:54 ` Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-20 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2019-03-20 14:21 ` David Marchand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-06 3:42 Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar)
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
2019-03-19 18:00 ` Chas Williams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).