From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
thomas@monjalon.net, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
gavin.hu@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/ticketlock: add ticket lock test case
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:13:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553159608-205213-4-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190321091328.ZyGCjIBNzOsEm4_vOjN7W2pZGKSTmhOulRYveFYhqPo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553159608-205213-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1547802943-18711-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
Add test cases for ticket lock, recursive ticket lock,
and ticket lock performance.
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/autotest_data.py | 6 +
app/test/meson.build | 1 +
app/test/test_ticketlock.c | 311 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 320 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_ticketlock.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 3521271..b1ed4cc 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ F: app/test/test_bitmap.c
Ticketlock
M: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_ticketlock.h
+F: app/test/test_ticketlock.c
ARM v7
M: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 89949c2..d6aa28b 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ SRCS-y += test_barrier.c
SRCS-y += test_malloc.c
SRCS-y += test_cycles.c
SRCS-y += test_spinlock.c
+SRCS-y += test_ticketlock.c
SRCS-y += test_memory.c
SRCS-y += test_memzone.c
SRCS-y += test_bitmap.c
diff --git a/app/test/autotest_data.py b/app/test/autotest_data.py
index 5f87bb9..db25274 100644
--- a/app/test/autotest_data.py
+++ b/app/test/autotest_data.py
@@ -171,6 +171,12 @@
"Report": None,
},
{
+ "Name": "Ticketlock autotest",
+ "Command": "ticketlock_autotest",
+ "Func": ticketlock_autotest,
+ "Report": None,
+ }
+ {
"Name": "Byte order autotest",
"Command": "byteorder_autotest",
"Func": default_autotest,
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index 05e5dde..ddb4d09 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
'test_timer.c',
'test_timer_perf.c',
'test_timer_racecond.c',
+ 'test_ticketlock.c',
'test_version.c',
'virtual_pmd.c'
)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ticketlock.c b/app/test/test_ticketlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..67281ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_ticketlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2018-2019 Arm Limited
+ */
+
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/queue.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+#include <rte_atomic.h>
+#include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_eal.h>
+#include <rte_launch.h>
+#include <rte_lcore.h>
+#include <rte_memory.h>
+#include <rte_per_lcore.h>
+#include <rte_ticketlock.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+
+/*
+ * Ticketlock test
+ * =============
+ *
+ * - There is a global ticketlock and a table of ticketlocks (one per lcore).
+ *
+ * - The test function takes all of these locks and launches the
+ * ``test_ticketlock_per_core()`` function on each core (except the master).
+ *
+ * - The function takes the global lock, display something, then releases
+ * the global lock.
+ * - The function takes the per-lcore lock, display something, then releases
+ * the per-core lock.
+ *
+ * - The main function unlocks the per-lcore locks sequentially and
+ * waits between each lock. This triggers the display of a message
+ * for each core, in the correct order. The autotest script checks that
+ * this order is correct.
+ *
+ * - A load test is carried out, with all cores attempting to lock a single lock
+ * multiple times
+ */
+
+static rte_ticketlock_t tl, tl_try;
+static rte_ticketlock_t tl_tab[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
+static rte_ticketlock_recursive_t tlr;
+static unsigned int count;
+
+static rte_atomic32_t synchro;
+
+static int
+test_ticketlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&tl);
+ printf("Global lock taken on core %u\n", rte_lcore_id());
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl);
+
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&tl_tab[rte_lcore_id()]);
+ printf("Hello from core %u !\n", rte_lcore_id());
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl_tab[rte_lcore_id()]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_ticketlock_recursive_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+ unsigned int id = rte_lcore_id();
+
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_lock(&tlr);
+ printf("Global recursive lock taken on core %u - count = %d\n",
+ id, tlr.count);
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_lock(&tlr);
+ printf("Global recursive lock taken on core %u - count = %d\n",
+ id, tlr.count);
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_lock(&tlr);
+ printf("Global recursive lock taken on core %u - count = %d\n",
+ id, tlr.count);
+
+ printf("Hello from within recursive locks from core %u !\n", id);
+
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+ printf("Global recursive lock released on core %u - count = %d\n",
+ id, tlr.count);
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+ printf("Global recursive lock released on core %u - count = %d\n",
+ id, tlr.count);
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+ printf("Global recursive lock released on core %u - count = %d\n",
+ id, tlr.count);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static rte_ticketlock_t lk = RTE_TICKETLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+static uint64_t lock_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE] = {0};
+
+#define TIME_MS 100
+
+static int
+load_loop_fn(void *func_param)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff = 0, begin;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+ uint64_t lcount = 0;
+ const int use_lock = *(int *)func_param;
+ const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
+
+ /* wait synchro for slaves */
+ if (lcore != rte_get_master_lcore())
+ while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
+ ;
+
+ begin = rte_get_timer_cycles();
+ while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) {
+ if (use_lock)
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&lk);
+ lcount++;
+ if (use_lock)
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&lk);
+ /* delay to make lock duty cycle slighlty realistic */
+ rte_delay_us(1);
+ time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
+ }
+ lock_count[lcore] = lcount;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_ticketlock_perf(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ uint64_t total = 0;
+ int lock = 0;
+ const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
+
+ printf("\nTest with no lock on single core...\n");
+ load_loop_fn(&lock);
+ printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", lcore, lock_count[lcore]);
+ memset(lock_count, 0, sizeof(lock_count));
+
+ printf("\nTest with lock on single core...\n");
+ lock = 1;
+ load_loop_fn(&lock);
+ printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", lcore, lock_count[lcore]);
+ memset(lock_count, 0, sizeof(lock_count));
+
+ printf("\nTest with lock on %u cores...\n", rte_lcore_count());
+
+ /* Clear synchro and start slaves */
+ rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0);
+ rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(load_loop_fn, &lock, SKIP_MASTER);
+
+ /* start synchro and launch test on master */
+ rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1);
+ load_loop_fn(&lock);
+
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(i) {
+ printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", i, lock_count[i]);
+ total += lock_count[i];
+ }
+
+ printf("Total count = %"PRIu64"\n", total);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Use rte_ticketlock_trylock() to trylock a ticketlock object,
+ * If it could not lock the object successfully, it would
+ * return immediately and the variable of "count" would be
+ * increased by one per times. the value of "count" could be
+ * checked as the result later.
+ */
+static int
+test_ticketlock_try(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+ if (rte_ticketlock_trylock(&tl_try) == 0) {
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&tl);
+ count++;
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * Test rte_eal_get_lcore_state() in addition to ticketlocks
+ * as we have "waiting" then "running" lcores.
+ */
+static int
+test_ticketlock(void)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ /* slave cores should be waiting: print it */
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ printf("lcore %d state: %d\n", i,
+ (int) rte_eal_get_lcore_state(i));
+ }
+
+ rte_ticketlock_init(&tl);
+ rte_ticketlock_init(&tl_try);
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_init(&tlr);
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ rte_ticketlock_init(&tl_tab[i]);
+ }
+
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&tl);
+
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&tl_tab[i]);
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_ticketlock_per_core, NULL, i);
+ }
+
+ /* slave cores should be busy: print it */
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ printf("lcore %d state: %d\n", i,
+ (int) rte_eal_get_lcore_state(i));
+ }
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl);
+
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl_tab[i]);
+ rte_delay_ms(10);
+ }
+
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_lock(&tlr);
+
+ /*
+ * Try to acquire a lock that we already own
+ */
+ if (!rte_ticketlock_recursive_trylock(&tlr)) {
+ printf("rte_ticketlock_recursive_trylock failed on a lock that "
+ "we already own\n");
+ ret = -1;
+ } else
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_ticketlock_recursive_per_core,
+ NULL, i);
+ }
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ /*
+ * Test if it could return immediately from try-locking a locked object.
+ * Here it will lock the ticketlock object first, then launch all the
+ * slave lcores to trylock the same ticketlock object.
+ * All the slave lcores should give up try-locking a locked object and
+ * return immediately, and then increase the "count" initialized with
+ * zero by one per times.
+ * We can check if the "count" is finally equal to the number of all
+ * slave lcores to see if the behavior of try-locking a locked
+ * ticketlock object is correct.
+ */
+ if (rte_ticketlock_trylock(&tl_try) == 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ count = 0;
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_ticketlock_try, NULL, i);
+ }
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl_try);
+ if (rte_ticketlock_is_locked(&tl)) {
+ printf("ticketlock is locked but it should not be\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ rte_ticketlock_lock(&tl);
+ if (count != (rte_lcore_count() - 1))
+ ret = -1;
+
+ rte_ticketlock_unlock(&tl);
+
+ /*
+ * Test if it can trylock recursively.
+ * Use rte_ticketlock_recursive_trylock() to check if it can lock
+ * a ticketlock object recursively. Here it will try to lock a
+ * ticketlock object twice.
+ */
+ if (rte_ticketlock_recursive_trylock(&tlr) == 0) {
+ printf("It failed to do the first ticketlock_recursive_trylock "
+ "but it should able to do\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (rte_ticketlock_recursive_trylock(&tlr) == 0) {
+ printf("It failed to do the second ticketlock_recursive_trylock "
+ "but it should able to do\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+ rte_ticketlock_recursive_unlock(&tlr);
+
+ if (test_ticketlock_perf() < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(ticketlock_autotest, test_ticketlock);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-21 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-13 14:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] ticketlock: ticket based to improve fairness Gavin Hu
2019-01-14 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-14 16:57 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-14 23:36 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-18 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Joyce Kong
2019-01-25 8:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ticketlock: implement ticketlock and add test case Joyce Kong
2019-02-19 10:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Joyce Kong
2019-03-11 5:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Joyce Kong
2019-02-19 10:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ticketlock: ticket based to improve fairness Joyce Kong
2019-03-11 5:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] eal/ticketlock: " Joyce Kong
2019-03-13 9:41 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-15 6:57 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-15 6:57 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-13 15:36 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-15 6:58 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-15 6:58 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-02-19 10:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/ticketlock: add ticket lock test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-11 5:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Joyce Kong
2019-03-13 13:31 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-15 6:57 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-15 6:57 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-25 8:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ticketlock: ticket based to improve fairness Joyce Kong
2019-01-25 8:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/ticketlock: add ticket lock test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-15 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] ticketlock: implement ticketlock and add " Joyce Kong
2019-03-15 6:56 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-15 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal/ticketlock: ticket based to improve fairness Joyce Kong
2019-03-15 6:56 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-15 12:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 12:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-19 9:44 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-19 9:44 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-19 10:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-19 10:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-20 5:11 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-20 5:11 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-20 9:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-20 9:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-22 2:04 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-22 2:04 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-15 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] test/ticketlock: add ticket lock test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-15 6:56 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 9:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] ticketlock: implement ticketlock and add " Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 9:13 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 9:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] eal/ticketlock: enable generic ticketlock on all arch Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 9:13 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 9:13 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2019-03-21 9:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/ticketlock: add ticket lock test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-22 11:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-22 11:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-25 10:25 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-25 10:25 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-21 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] eal/ticketlock: ticket based to improve fairness Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 9:15 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-22 10:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-22 10:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-25 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] ticketlock: implement ticketlock and add test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 11:11 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-27 11:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-27 11:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-28 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-25 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] eal/ticketlock: ticket based to improve fairness Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 11:11 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] eal/ticketlock: enable generic ticketlock on all arch Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 11:11 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/ticketlock: add ticket lock test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 11:11 ` Joyce Kong
2019-04-08 20:18 ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 20:18 ` David Marchand
2019-04-14 20:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-14 20:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-15 9:07 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-15 9:07 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-01-18 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] " Joyce Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553159608-205213-4-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com \
--to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).