From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
thomas@monjalon.net, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/rwlock: amortize the cost of getting time
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:14:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553505299-34459-4-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190325091459.MqKFqAYf-jTGrxTDawZvh2TP0G2jzA5Bff9AuM3Muhs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553505299-34459-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1544672265-219262-2-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
Instead of getting timestamp per iteration, amortize its
overhead can help to get more precise benchmarking results.
Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_rwlock.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_rwlock.c b/app/test/test_rwlock.c
index 1d3774e..c3d656a 100644
--- a/app/test/test_rwlock.c
+++ b/app/test/test_rwlock.c
@@ -86,9 +86,9 @@ test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
static rte_rwlock_t lk = RTE_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
static volatile uint64_t rwlock_data;
-static uint64_t lock_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE] = {0};
+static uint64_t time_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE] = {0};
-#define TIME_MS 100
+#define MAX_LOOP 10000
#define TEST_RWLOCK_DEBUG 0
static int
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ load_loop_fn(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
;
begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
- while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) {
+ while (lcount < MAX_LOOP) {
rte_rwlock_write_lock(&lk);
++rwlock_data;
rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&lk);
@@ -119,10 +119,10 @@ load_loop_fn(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
lcount++;
/* delay to make lock duty cycle slightly realistic */
rte_pause();
- time_diff = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
}
- lock_count[lcore] = lcount;
+ time_diff = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
+ time_count[lcore] = time_diff * 1000000 / hz;
return 0;
}
@@ -146,11 +146,13 @@ test_rwlock_perf(void)
rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(i) {
- printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", i, lock_count[i]);
- total += lock_count[i];
+ printf("Core [%u] cost time = %"PRIu64" us\n",
+ i, time_count[i]);
+ total += time_count[i];
}
- printf("Total count = %"PRIu64"\n", total);
+ printf("Total cost time = %"PRIu64" us\n", total);
+ memset(time_count, 0, sizeof(time_count));
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-25 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 3:37 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] reimplement rwlock and add relevant perf test case Joyce Kong
2018-12-13 3:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] test/rwlock: add " Joyce Kong
2018-12-19 23:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-12-20 1:01 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 1:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-14 13:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] rwlock: reimplement rwlock with atomic and add relevant " Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 13:15 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 13:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] rwlock: reimplement with atomic builtins Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 13:15 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 15:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-14 15:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-15 3:04 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-15 3:04 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-15 11:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 11:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-19 8:31 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-19 8:31 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-14 13:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] test/rwlock: add perf test case on all available cores Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 13:15 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 13:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/rwlock: amortize the cost of getting time Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 13:15 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-14 15:02 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-14 15:02 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-20 6:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] rwlock: reimplement rwlock with atomic and add relevant perf test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-20 6:25 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-20 6:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] rwlock: reimplement with atomic builtins Joyce Kong
2019-03-20 6:25 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 18:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-21 18:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-25 9:18 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-25 9:18 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-20 6:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/rwlock: add perf test case on all available cores Joyce Kong
2019-03-20 6:25 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 18:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-21 18:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-20 6:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/rwlock: amortize the cost of getting time Joyce Kong
2019-03-20 6:25 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-21 18:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-21 18:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-25 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] rwlock: reimplement rwlock with atomic and add relevant perf test case Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 9:14 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-28 10:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 10:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-16 14:57 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-16 14:57 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-03-25 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] rwlock: reimplement with atomic builtins Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 9:14 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/rwlock: add perf test case on all available cores Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 9:14 ` Joyce Kong
2019-03-25 9:14 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2019-03-25 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/rwlock: amortize the cost of getting time Joyce Kong
2018-12-13 3:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] rwlock: reimplement with __atomic builtins Joyce Kong
2018-12-19 23:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-12-13 5:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] reimplement rwlock and add relevant perf test case Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-14 1:30 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-17 5:16 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-19 20:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553505299-34459-4-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com \
--to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).